Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization vs. SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenShift Virtualization is a feature of Red Hat OpenShift that offers a unified, scalable platform for migrating traditional VMs. It ensures consistent management across hybrid cloud environments and supports modernization efforts.N/A
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
SolarWinds® Virtualization Manager (VMAN) is a tool for monitoring, performance management, capacity planning and optimization for on-premises or cloud-based virtual environments. It also integrates with other SolarWinds products.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Considered Both Products
Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
its great and I would reccomend it to for managing VM's and helping to transition the workloads to a more container workflow
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
They go hand in hand, makes sense for someone with knowledge if both. Creates the ecosystem with single management plane.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
I choose those products because in my organization we use a lot. As well, those products are very important for our improvement.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Microsoft Windows
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
They are all perfectly serviceable options but Red Hat virtualization seemed like a better fit for our technical needs, our existing environment, and the quality of our vendor relationship.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Azure VMware Solution, Oracle Virtualization and Nutanix AHV
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure, Hyper-V and SUSE Rancher
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Proxmox VE and VMware ESXi
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Proxmox VE
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
We do Ansible Automation Platform to facilitate our code deployments, to resolve vulnerabilities etc and that does simplify the work that we do. Likewise, OpenShift Virtualization helps simplify operating system maintenance etc
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
I haven't used it yet.

aun no lo utilizo
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
It is better from the point of view of costs, but also provides a better management and extended features.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Nothing like OpenShift. Actually, this was our first one. We toyed with maybe doing raw Kubernetes, but with an enterprise company you need an enterprise product.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
SUSE Rancher
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
It was microsoft hypervisor and vmware.
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
Cisco Compute Hyperconverged with Nutanix
Chose Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization
OpenShift is moving in the direction of VMware and is a good first step in the process.
SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
To be honest we never looked into any other products. We already made use of SolarWinds SAN, and once we found out SolarWinds was also able to monitor our virtual environment, we immediately had a trial of the software. We were very happy with what the VMAN component had to …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
ScienceLogic SL1
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
We selected [SolarWinds] VMAN because we already had [SolarWinds] products and it was simple enough to get it added in.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
In the past we had used VMware's VRealize yet this integration into our Orion platform makes it easier to work with plus there is price savings when we moved to VMAN.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
The operation began using Nagios Xi, after a year of use, and based on the results obtained, we realized that what our client wanted was not fully met. Our client asked us to use WhatsUp, however, SolarWinds covered in a more efficient way what was required by our client (IT) …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
SolarWinds VMAN provides comprehensive monitoring and performance metrics for your VM environment. Provides Recommendations for optimal VM performance. SolarWinds VMAN integrates with the Orion Platform and provides a single pane of glass for monitoring your entire VM …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Logic Monitoring
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
We chose SolarWinds for the price point, the ability for Single Pain of Glass monitoring for Dashboards, and having a single vendor to support all our monitoring needs.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Honestly we didn't check in depth other vendors, because we use the entire Solarwinds Eco-system.
So first of all, we want to keep one unique tool to handle everything. In addition the migration to another product would be super difficult or nearly impossible.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Datadog and Log Monitor are doing great in bringing in new technologies for monitoring, however SolarWinds has still got edges since we are using it [for] many years. By using [it], we know that their product development team was always on top of new technologies monitoring. …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
  • Good performance of the application
  • Visually well designed
  • Really useful topology creation in comparison to most competitors
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Better performance monitoring. Was able to see bottlenecks in our network that we were able to address. Ability to set thresholds and critical warning alerts to match our specific business needs and parameters. The predefined reports helped us with metrics to ensure the …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
If you used these two products, you know the difference. It's too vast to explain here. PRTG does have its place in a network, but SolarWinds is the high bar in this space.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Virtualization Manager does a much better job of bringing all of the relevant system information together in an easy to view and use interface.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Veeam ONE is a product to compare against SolarWinds Virtualization Manager. Veeam ONE is a solid product, however, SolarWinds Virtualization Manager has multiple product tie-ins for a bigger more complete picture of the total environment it is deployed in. It is hard to put a …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
We have trialed almost all of the SolarWinds family of products if they were seen to have a potential positive effect on our environment and ability to find/resolve problems. We are currently using all of the products outlined previously as it gives us an excellent top down …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
It has the capability of all monitoring products individually and it is easy to work within the VMware monitoring tool.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
We have had so much success with Solarwinds that we did not look at any other options.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
In our experience, the market for exemplary tools for managing a VMware environment is pretty small. Either go with the VMware tools, which may or may not be part of your enterprise licensing, or use a 3rd-party platform. If you have a multi-vendor environment (say VMware + …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
None.
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
The Cisco solution is more expensive and complex to install and configure
The VMware horizon does not detect and manage the non VMware VMs such as Microsoft Hyper-V
In case the environment is purely VMware, then VMware horizon provides more possibilities of managing the VMs and …
Chose SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Seamless incorporation into the Orion framework. We needed a tool to tell us what was going on with our vSphere environment beyond what vCenter was telling us. There are just 2 of us that manage 40 ESXi hosts on1000 virtual machines and we needed some additional insight. I have …
Best Alternatives
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Small Businesses
Hyper-V
Hyper-V
Score 8.2 out of 10
Hyper-V
Hyper-V
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.3
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.9
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.4
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat OpenShift VirtualizationSolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
Likelihood to Recommend
I believe that Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization is a very promising option for hypervisor at the moment and it seems to be improving quickly. Red Hat is doing a great job working with customers on feature set requests and improving UX and stability
Read full review
[It is well suited for] full integration with the virtual environment (VMware vcenter in our case). [It is also useful] when updating [the] host to a new version, including [a] new version of VM Tools. Messages are automatically created in SolarWinds VMAN to notice which VM's still need to be updated with [the] newer version of VM tools. This [makes] management [easy].
Read full review
Pros
  • Easiness of deployment, we can deploy the full stack completely and hardened easier than other container products
  • Used to host different workloads (CNF and VNF).
  • Easy to scale on both the worker and the infra layer
  • Infra nodes do not require subscriptions, which means we are only paying for our workload only, and no hidden costs.
Read full review
  • I created custom dashboards, to view the different elements of the virtual environment. For example, you can view the number of online VMs and those off, or disconnected. You can also choose to see the status of every virtual cluster, the storage disk usage on every VM, the RAM usage, CPU usage.
  • I used this application to see the growth of virtual memory in each cluster and accordingly do forecasting for future growth. A capacity planner included in this application would help in doing accurate estimations and setting a future upgrade budget.
  • Another powerful tool was the customized reports, where i could generate reports on any element of the VM or cluster. Reports can be exported to Excel or PDF and are very useful for sharing information with colleagues and management.
  • Alerts can be customized. For example, you can set a rule to get an email alert if any virtual server RAM usage exceeds 85% and send a text message if RAM usage exceeds 90% for more than 10 minutes.
Read full review
Cons
  • Because of how different virtualization is done, there is a learning curve to overcome when switching to it from another hypervisor.
  • Documentation needs to be improved. Just finding the details to set it up is a burden that will keep some people using it.
Read full review
  • Server trending could be stronger. A server which sits at the same resource usage day in and day out can be normal operation while Virtualization manager may report it as an issue.
  • Orion in general can be painful to change a node page with the desired screens and widgets
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenShift is really easy of use through its management console. OpenShift gives a very large flexibility through many inbuilt functionalities, all gathered in the same place (it's a very convenient tool to learn DevOps technics hands on) OpenShift is an ideal integrated development / deployment platform for containers
Read full review
Critical component for companies ability to maintain services both customer facing as well as internal systems. Without insight into our VM estate provided by VMAN outage duration as well as frequency would increase to unacceptable levels. VMAN has allowed us to consolidate multiple monitoring mechanisms into one, as part of the Orion suite providing us with 1 solution. This has the added benefit of enabling our engineers to focus on learning 1 solution oppose to multiple solutions, meaning we're able to handle administration and support of our monitoring across the whole company alot more efficiently from a time spent resource as well as savings on costings.
Read full review
Usability
The product is maturing at an amazing rate, but there is still work to do to reach existing VMware customers. Most notably are the HA/DR features, and backup/recovery. We need to have faster backup capabilities, and I know this is in the works with change block tracking - but it is a challenge today. Some users are also scared by the number of volumes created by Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, as opposed to the number of VMFS volumes they are used to.
Read full review
SolarWinds VMAN is easy to use for everyone. When I say everyone which literally means anyone e.g. Virtualization Environment SME, Consultant, Support Team, Management Officers etc. Anyone who have worked on IT technologies could easily deploy SolarWinds by reading videos, Thwack posts or Virtual Classrooms (Custom Success Centers) - this makes this application easy to operation and for maintenance support is always there.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
We have yet to enconter any issues in terms of availability. We have a highly available SQL cluster running Orion.
Read full review
Performance
We have already hab cases in which our customers have a better application performance even in legacy architectures running on Jboss, and even more on cloud native architectures. Customers who hosted their applications on Jboss and wildfly, when running on top of Red Hat OpenShift could benefit from more stability and availability, and in some cases, gains of performance.
Read full review
We find page load times to be quite slow at times. Flipping between tabs can also be very slow.
Read full review
Support Rating
Speedy support
Read full review
SolarWinds gives good support. I have never had a time when i was working through a support case where I did not get the support I needed for the required issues to be resolved. I have always had resolutions from SolarWinds support. They are top notch. Issues once had are no more.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
The learning curve is quite high but worth it.
Read full review
Pretty straighforward, as long as you check Solarwinds site for recommended installation path. KEY ITEM - be sure that you know which versions of all SolarWinds products you are using, because there are incompatability issues between versions for many products. It took me about 2 hours with a spreadsheet to figure out an upgrade path. Don't assume that the version you downloaded is the right/most current version without checking first!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Some of the various other Kubernetes out there, including Rancher, is probably one of the biggest one. Rancher has a reputation for being very easy to implement. I've found that Red Hat OpenShift is just as easy to implement as Rancher. People just don't really know about it. Nutanix is another hypervisor out there competing with Red Hat OpenShift. Again, I think OpenShift virtualization but maybe isn't as old as Nutanix. I do feel it's more mature.
Read full review
To be honest we never looked into any other products. We already made use of SolarWinds SAN, and once we found out SolarWinds was also able to monitor our virtual environment, we immediately had a trial of the software. We were very happy with what the VMAN component had to offer as well as having it integrate into our already existing SolarWinds SAM environment.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Purchasing the correct license allows the platform to scale with your environment.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has allowed us to see where we need to be in the container world. I'm going to call it a net neutral impact, not negative or positive. It has given us a sense of what we are ready for and what we're not ready for. You know where you stand.
  • You don't know what you don't know, so it helps us know what we want to know.
Read full review
  • VMAN has been used for reports provided to executive-level meetings. These reports showed our growth patterns, allowing for easier decisions on purchasing additional hardware.
  • VMAN has provided a positive impact on allowing for near real-time monitoring of resources, able to pinpoint when services are using more memory than expected, not running at all, or other options as defined.
  • VMAN was purchased to help monitor our VMware platform, the added abilities for AWS allowed us to migrate clients from on-prem to cloud-based with the same views.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN) Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of