SAI360 vs. SAP Sustainability Control Tower

The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.

Incentivized

It is basically the easiest choice for people who are already running SAP ECC or S4 as their ERP as that means they can get all of the data sources automatically without mapping efforts. That compensates for some of the shortcomings mentioned earlier, and to be fair, tools from other vendors (e.g., Microsoft) have the same problem anyway.

Incentivized

• Customized unified design platform
• Modules that fit your organization
• Low technology involvement with information department.
• Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
• Single sign-on web-based applications

Incentivized

• Gather and organize company data
• Calculate sustainability metrics
• Report metrics/indicators according to mandatory or voluntary sustainability standards
• Customize it to the clients needs and operations

Incentivized

• Integration with SAP for continuous control monitoring.
• Control mapping to standards: ISO; COSO; COBIT; HIPAA; SP800_53 (NIST); FedRAMP; PCI_DSS; BITS; GAAP; AICPA; BSI; CCM; COPPA; CSA
• Surveys.

Incentivized

• Implementing Custom Metrics: Support for all DPI dimensions needed
• Drill-Down Requirements: Full dimension availability via OData API
• Row Limit Issue: Request limit inadequate for data volume
• Breakdown by all dimensions for metrics not feasible

Incentivized

BWIse is very flexible, and an affordable GRC tool.

Incentivized

We are currently too new with The SAP sustainability Control tower ,but down the line if we see more benefits to financial sustain the product and product is actually paying off the cost from the benefits we get out of it we may renew the use of SAP sustainability control tower.

Incentivized

Overall it is a very versatile system that does help to keep our processes automated and secure. We are able to streamline our day to day activities.

Incentivized

I gave SAP Sustainability Control Tower this usability rating because, in my opinion, SAP Sustainability Control Tower is the best in the industry

BWise support is knowledgeable and responsive. Bug fixes and development are also timely and ongoing.

Incentivized

not contacted support for SAP Sustainability Control Tower yet.

Incentivized

The main issues were managing the internal conflicts and competing objectives, rather than the capability and implementation of BWise itself.

Incentivized

No, I was not directly involved in SAP Sustainability Control Tower implementation, but before implementing feedback was taken from procurement team for several function usage.

Incentivized

Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).

Incentivized

Same lack of industry-specific content on both, but SAP has the main advantage of direct connection to the ERP data so it saves significant efforts in comparison. Regarding dashboards look and feel and so on, it is more a matter of personal preference between PowerBi and SAP, we personally prefer SAP as it is a bit richer in ability to bring in more data and filter on it.

Incentivized

• Pre-built training courses for certification that have a higher ROI than building your own courses.
• Helped customers training their personnel to achieve multiple management system certifications.

Incentivized

• Greater transparency around our sust strategies
• More engaged workforce
• Reduce OpEx by $350k in first month due to better decision in a particular area

Incentivized