SAI360 vs. VGS platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SAI360
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
SAI360 merges GRC software and Ethics & Compliance Learning to enhance risk management. Its scalable solutions have supported global organizations for 25+ years.N/A
VGS platform
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Very Good Security (VGS) lets companies use and exchange any kind of sensitive data without ever needing to see or hold the data itself. Built on the premise that “you can’t hack what isn’t there”, VGS is on a mission to protect the world’s information by transforming security and privacy from a business obstacle into an opportunity. VGS provides what they describe as a developer-friendly platform to act as a custodian for sensitive data, improving security while also accelerating business…N/A
Pricing
SAI360VGS platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SAI360VGS platform
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$4 per operation
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SAI360VGS platform
Considered Both Products
SAI360
Chose SAI360
Archer was very similar to SAI360 in cost and features. Has a more modern look and feel and more task functionality. The price point was very similar. Didn't choose them as our existing usage is in an On-Prem version and support from our in-house IT team was not able to be …
Chose SAI360
Also evaluated, and implemented SAP GRC Process control for Continuous Control Monitoring in SAP. Initially selected BWise for cost and flexibility.
Chose SAI360
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
VGS platform
Chose VGS platform
We evaluated Drata as an alternative for VGS Control, but VGS platform control integrates a lot of controls around VGS itself and also with Cloud Infra that we use, which makes the process faster. Also keeping everything with the same vendor makes things easier to manage.
Features
SAI360VGS platform
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
SAI360
7.7
Ratings
4% above category average
VGS platform
-
Ratings
Common repository of GRC items9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Risk management7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
GRC policy management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident management7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SAI360VGS platform
Small Businesses
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 9.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SAI360VGS platform
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SAI360VGS platform
Likelihood to Recommend
The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.
Read full review
If you are working with payments and you don`t want to store that kind of data to avoid a lot of strict requirements and headaches with tight processes, strict security, encryption and everything else you can leverage VGS platform to greatly reduce the work needed to enable payments in your system. They also provide tokenization for some other kinds of data but we currently do not use them. VGS platform also provides a product for compliance and controls (VGS Control) which helps you get ready and maintain compliance in your organization.
Read full review
Pros
  • Customized unified design platform
  • Modules that fit your organization
  • Low technology involvement with information department.
  • Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
  • Single sign-on web-based applications
Read full review
  • Tokenization of credit card data
  • Tokenization of some PII data
  • Accelerates compliances certifications
Read full review
Cons
  • Internal Quality Check. I think this is the most prominent area BWise should improve on. Currently they lack internal Quality Check/Review.
  • Internal dialogue among employees. When various consultants are involved in the same project, their communication and updating each-other could be a bit stronger.
  • Inclusion of content. The application could benefit considerably from including some out-of-the-box content (e.g. COSO principles, Risk catalogs, etc.).
  • Risk Workshop functionality. This is one of the main functionalities that allows integration among different areas of an organization. However, it comes pretty much "take it or leave it"; it's almost not customizable.
  • Consultants' transparency. When an organization requests a particular design of the application or solicits changes to such design, it would be great if BWise consultants could always and more thoroughly advise on the implications of these changes, design to the organization's strategic objectives and ultimate target.
  • Product features. Application has room for improving its programming, e.g. providing internal checks when creating/answering an issue/finding (for instance, remedy implementation date cannot be before the recommendation response date or the recommendation creation date). Another example would be the possibility of automatic periodic followup (e.g. every 1 month until completion).
Read full review
  • Infrastructure as Code
  • Alerting
  • Debugging
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
BWIse is very flexible, and an affordable GRC tool.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Overall it is a very versatile system that does help to keep our processes automated and secure. We are able to streamline our day to day activities.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
BWise support is knowledgeable and responsive. Bug fixes and development are also timely and ongoing.
Read full review
The support is pretty decent, sometimes take a little bit o time to solve things (not critical things) but that is part of the ticketing/email async communication so its fine. All the times I had to contact support a got my issue solved and a lot of attention from the support team to help solving the issue.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
The main issues were managing the internal conflicts and competing objectives, rather than the capability and implementation of BWise itself.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Wasn't personally involved in the vendor selection process. I am aware that one of the main drivers for selecting BWise was cost (I believe BWise total project cost was several times lower than MetricStream's).
Read full review
We evaluated Drata as an alternative for VGS Control, but VGS platform control integrates a lot of controls around VGS itself and also with Cloud Infra that we use, which makes the process faster. Also keeping everything with the same vendor makes things easier to manage.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The system is costly for the initial setup
  • Does help to mitigate risk and keep the vendors and internal departments from becoming non-compliant.
  • One license for all users
  • Easy to manage employee's security access
Read full review
  • Increased sales and revenue (enabled digital payments)
  • Enabled PCI compliance
  • Increased security
Read full review
ScreenShots