Sharebrand vs. Progress ShareFile
Sharebrand vs. Progress ShareFile
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sharebrand | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | Sharebrand is a white-label file sharing platform for businesses. Agencies, studios, freelancers, consultants, photographers, and law firms use it to share files with clients, teams, and partners from a custom domain they own, with their logo and brand on every page. Recipients never encounter Sharebrand's name in any part of the experience. The core problem it solves Many file sharing tools carry their own brand into the sender's… | $29 per month | |
Progress ShareFile | N/A | ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011, and is now offered by Progress Software. | $52.80 per month 3 users (minimum) |
| Sharebrand | Progress ShareFile | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Discount available for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Sharebrand | Progress ShareFile |
|---|
| Sharebrand | Progress ShareFile | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| File Sharing & Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Security & Administration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Platform |
|
| Sharebrand | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SugarSync Score 4.1 out of 10 | SugarSync Score 4.1 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10 | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10 | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Sharebrand | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.2 (113 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (8 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 6.5 (26 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (14 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (14 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (3 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 6.6 (2 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
| Sharebrand | Progress ShareFile | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Pros | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Cons | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Likelihood to Renew | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Usability | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Reliability and Availability | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Performance | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Support Rating | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Implementation Rating | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Alternatives Considered | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Scalability | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| Return on Investment | Tarkle Inc. No answers on this topic | ![]() Progress ShareFile
|
| ScreenShots | Progress ShareFile Screenshots |













