Progress ShareFile vs. TeamDrive

TeamDrive

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Progress ShareFile	Score 8.5 out of 10	N/A	ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011, and is now offered by Progress Software.	$17.60 per month per user (minimum 3 users)
TeamDrive	Score 9.0 out of 10	N/A	TeamDrive is a secure Sync & Share solution with end-to-end encryption for storing and synchronising files. With TeamDrive users can create secure spaces in their file system that synchronize between all their devices. The client lets users share those spaces with friends and colleagues. The vendor says this is especially helpful if users have to save or share confidential data. TeamDrive can create automated backups for all the organization's spaces and users can trace all changes made to their…	$0 1 license with 2 GB storage

Pricing

Progress ShareFile

TeamDrive

Editions & Modules

Advanced: $17.60
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Premium: $27.50
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Industry Advantage: $45.83
per month per user (minimum 3 users)
Virtual Data Room: $75.00
per month per user (minimum 5 users)

Personal Private Use: $0.00
1 license with 2 GB storage
Professional Starter 1 Cloud: $67.00
1 license with 10 GB storage, per year
Personal Server: $95.00
1 license
Professional Starter 5 Cloud: $337.00
5 licenses with 100 GB storage, per year
Professional Starter 5 Server: $337.00
5 licenses
Professional Starter 10 Cloud: $1117.00
10 licenses with 500 GB storage, per year
Professional Starter 25 Cloud: $2245.00
25 licenses with 1000 GB storage, per year
SME: $10142.00
150 licenses, 1 Enterprise-Hosting-Server License, 1 Tenant with Management Console, 1 Module external authentication
Enterprise: $33787.00
500 licenses, 1 TeamDrive Enterprise Registration Server License, 1 Enterprise-Hosting-Server License

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Progress ShareFile	TeamDrive
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

$67 per professional license, per year

Additional Details

Discount available for annual pricing.

Please visit our Shop for more information.

More Pricing Information

Pricing info

Community Pulse
	Progress ShareFile	TeamDrive
Considered Both Products	Progress ShareFile Craig Jeffery Managing Partner Chose Progress ShareFile We are in the early stages of evaluating Podio. It is supremely flexible for advanced workflow management and is currently the leading contender for when we move forward. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile Progress ShareFile is the option which my employer selected which I have free access to. The other platforms that I have utilized are in connection with an M&A transaction that a client or advisor has engaged for the transaction. ShareFile is simple to use for its options but … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile better and easier usability, better security Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile The other software is for document management and signing. We prefer Progress ShareFile for its original file transfer and sharing functions. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile Not applicable Incentivized Helpful? Chris Marreel Technical Expert Chose Progress ShareFile creating those anonymous download-links is the main factor I use Progress ShareFile, besides ofcourse the sharing of "big" files with easy access to other end-users Incentivized Helpful? Terry Hamberg Publisher Chose Progress ShareFile ShareFile offers more professional level services, and doesn't constantly "run out" of space, forcing you to upgrade to continue. When doing a cost comparison, the competitors may seem cheaper at first, but by the time you add on the features to make it comparable, the pricing … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile The ability to learn how to access, store, share, and retrieve documents is simpler than in other applications, and that is what keeps me in the application. Even though my Microsoft 365 professional and Adobe Acrobat Pro applications, which I currently subscribe to, include … Incentivized Helpful? Tom Hamilton Sr. Engineer Chose Progress ShareFile Dropbox and others like Mega is are open to anyone and when they leave your company they take those documents with them. ShareFile give secure sharing but you keep control of your documents. ShareFile also offers other tools like Outlook plug-ins and windows mapping tools. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile ShareFile is cheaper, but I think Box had more user friendly features Incentivized Helpful? CC Christy Chapman Executive Director Chose Progress ShareFile DocuSign did not allow me to save directly to a client folder. ShareFile will allow this, and it cut out having to move or download the file then store it in a client folder. We used that along with Dropbox. Dropbox did not allow us to seamlessly see who had access to what … Incentivized Helpful? Ryan Ippolito Partner Chose Progress ShareFile I use ShareFile because it is simple and offers easy use of esignatures - and unlimited. Docusign is getting expensive and charges often on a per "envelope" basis which doesn't work for me. Incentivized Helpful? George Fuller Managing Member Chose Progress ShareFile It has been years since I compared ShareFile with other secure data storage offerings. I chose ShareFile because of its affordability and need to have scalability. Dropbox, while it gives 2GB of free storage, seems to charge more for the same service I get with ShareFile. I … Incentivized Helpful? Judy Hughes CSR/Agent Chose Progress ShareFile Ease of use, cost and proficiency is above and beyond what other products offer. Customer service is down to earth, and you feel like your concerns are addressed appropriately. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile I chose to stick with ShareFile because of the signature certificate feature that is included with the software. The two programs are both relativley easy for me to use, but Adobe Acrobat does not have this feature included. Additionally, ShareFile can be opened in Browser and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile The ShareFile website never broke, so we switched the signature service to this platform too. Because in PandaDoc sometimes it was hard to find some signed documents from years ago, also we couldn't find an efficient way to order the signature documents for each client, but … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile A lot more user friendly and less phone calls for assistance which make the purpose of smooth electronic communication a great thing. I like that it doesn't require 1 person to sign before the other person can and that we are notified separately once each person signs required … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile The large file size for uploading and downloading documents was the one thing that the others just couldn't compare to. Incentivized Helpful? SS Sergio Sancho Product Manager Chose Progress ShareFile Other platforms allow you to share information but without the security and confirmation guarantees that ShareFile offers. Although they provide fewer features, they are often less intuitive and less easy to work with. To date we do not consider trying other options, as we do … Incentivized Helpful? Richard Corner Senior Partner Chose Progress ShareFile We have one consulting engineer that uses MS Sharepoint. We find it comparable to ShareFile, but see no particular advantage to it over ShareFile. We don't really know a lot about it, or what it costs to use. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile I think Dropbox is a plague to the world of cloud storage. It sucks. ShareFile doesn't suck. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Progress ShareFile For an organization that requires reliable security when sending sensitive data, ShareFile is the application to use. ShareFile has multiple features to ensure that the right information is being sent with the file so the end receiver has the pertinent information when the file … Incentivized Helpful? PC Pamela Corn Owner Chose Progress ShareFile I like ShareFile much better than Mango Practice Management. I think the navigation is much more intuitive and user-friendly. Incentivized Helpful? GP Guy Page Sr Director of Operations Chose Progress ShareFile The workflow are more difficult to follow in the others. Incentivized Helpful? KH Kate Herman Owner CPA Chose Progress ShareFile I feel ShareFile is much more secure. Incentivized Helpful?	TeamDrive Heather Mckenzie Information Technology Administrator Chose TeamDrive Filestack support wasn't offering rapid responses to our tickets. For that reason, we decided to implement TeamDrive since they responded rapidly via phone call and allocated 30 days free trial that we enjoyed before upgrading. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Progress ShareFile

TeamDrive

File Sharing & Management

Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
	Progress ShareFile 8.3 Ratings 1% below category average	TeamDrive 10.0 Ratings 18% above category average
Versioning	8.30 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Video files	7.40 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Audio files	7.60 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Document collaboration	8.40 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Access control	9.10 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
File search	8.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Device sync	9.30 Ratings	10.00 Ratings

Cloud Storage Security & Administration

Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Product A and Product B
	Progress ShareFile 9.1 Ratings 5% above category average	TeamDrive 10.0 Ratings 15% above category average
User and role management	9.20 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
File organization	9.20 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Device management	9.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings

Cloud Storage Platform

Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Product A and Product B
	Progress ShareFile 8.0 Ratings 8% below category average	TeamDrive 10.0 Ratings 14% above category average
Performance	8.70 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Reliability	8.00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Storage Reports	7.30 Ratings	10.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Progress ShareFile	TeamDrive
Small Businesses	SugarSync Score 3.8 out of 10	SugarSync Score 3.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Progress ShareFile	TeamDrive
Likelihood to Recommend	8.7 (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	7.4 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Availability	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	1.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Configurability	6.6 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	1.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	1.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	9.1 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Progress ShareFile	TeamDrive
Likelihood to Recommend	Progress ShareFile has been a great tool for sharing files. When you send to outside people they get an easy link to click on to download the needed files. On the sender side you get options to have the person do things logon to get the file, just enter a name and email address, or just click on the link and download. There are hooks to use other tools to scan for personal information like SSN or credit card numbers. Many of our users use email to send and store emails. They have found that clicking on a link to get a file adds a bit of complexity but many have learned how to adjust to the change. Incentivized Tom Hamilton Sr. Engineer Read full review	Nothing gets lost on TeamDrive since SYNQION offers both offline and online file sync. Data protection seal allows us to control who can access data on it. Incentivized Heather Mckenzie Information Technology Administrator Read full review
Pros	I think that one of ShareFile's greatest strengths is its ease of use. With the outlook plug-in sharing large documents is so quick and easy. I also like the security and control that is provided for who can access the documents and tracking the changes within them. I think it does well at protecting information that leaves the company. I also think the website is well organized and easy to use. It was very easy for us to implement and train our employees on the proper use of the website and software. Incentivized christian Maxwell Project Engineer Read full review	Collaboration of teams on documents and files. Offers cloud and on-premise platforms on our company server. Enhances file synchronization even when offline. Allocates encrypted back-up copy in case of data loss. Offers 30 days free trial. Incentivized Heather Mckenzie Information Technology Administrator Read full review
Cons	Users grow quickly (each client gets a separate account). Automated pruning would be nice. I'm not aware of integration with Office365 online (only the outlook app). This could make it harder for some users. It would be nice to have something that auto-scans emails and attachments for PII and would require Sharefile for those emails. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Were it not for the fact that everyone hasn't yet implemented TeamDrive in our organization - I totally have nothing in mind that need to be advanced. Incentivized Heather Mckenzie Information Technology Administrator Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	It's a highly effective and secure storage system, has robust workarounds for serving the various equipment limits of our users, meets high security requirements of HIPAA standards, significantly reduces our needs for producing paper trails. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	Some of the clunkiness in the user interface and the processing of documents could be made more seamless. However, once you get over that learning curve, it's straightforward enough. The API for integrating external systems is well documented, and the support crew is great at getting you over the rough spots. There's nothing bad about their system, just a few things I thought could be more elegant. Michael Sypes Programmer Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability	The software has never been down when I needed to use it. Incentivized PC Pamela Corn Owner Read full review	No answers on this topic
Performance	Easy to use, easy to integrate with Outlook. I only gave it a 9 because I have found that sometimes it does not play nicely with Outlook and can slow it down. But, when that happens (not frequent), I restart Outlook and all is well again Incentivized Andrew Simpson Attorney/President Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	Typically the support is very knowledgeable and interested in following an issue until it is fully resolved. I have not had any issues working with their staff as they are all polite and easy to communicate with. If the first or second level tech does not fix the concern then it is escalated until we get to someone who can close the case. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating	Good documentation for the API. With a little help from RS tech staff, any competent programmer should be able to integrate RightSignature with an existing system in a week or three. That help is easy to get as well Michael Sypes Programmer Analyst Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	ShareFile offers more professional level services, and doesn't constantly "run out" of space, forcing you to upgrade to continue. When doing a cost comparison, the competitors may seem cheaper at first, but by the time you add on the features to make it comparable, the pricing is as much, if not more, than what we're paying for ShareFile. The access control level is better with ShareFile, so we chose to stay with them. Terry Hamberg Publisher Read full review	Filestack support wasn't offering rapid responses to our tickets. For that reason, we decided to implement TeamDrive since they responded rapidly via phone call and allocated 30 days free trial that we enjoyed before upgrading. Incentivized Heather Mckenzie Information Technology Administrator Read full review
Scalability	I am a one person office. I have no idea how this software would scale to a larger office. Incentivized PC Pamela Corn Owner Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	All of our clients and consulting engineers find ShareFile easy to use, thus complementing our business. Our staff also find ShareFile intuitive, accessible, and easy to use, making it an ideal, everyday indispensable desktop tool for everyone in our company. ShareFile can be linked to our firm's primary website as a placed for private use. We haven't found need for this yet, but might in the future. Incentivized Richard Corner Senior Partner Read full review	Offline synchronization makes changes on files even when not connected to the internet. Collaboration of teams on documents improve productivity. Data governance through end-to-end encryption. Incentivized Heather Mckenzie Information Technology Administrator Read full review
ScreenShots	Progress ShareFile Screenshots	TeamDrive Screenshots