Progress ShareFile vs. Triofox
Progress ShareFile vs. Triofox
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Progress ShareFile | N/A | ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011. | $52.80 per month 3 users (minimum) | |
Triofox | N/A | Triofox, from Gladinet, is a solution to modernize remote access for a hybrid workforce. It is a remote access solution for on-premises file servers and cloud data. Triofox enhances existing Windows file servers and cloud storage with secure remote access, mobile file sharing, and data protection while addressing business concerns about security, privacy, compliance, and control. Triofox is used to enhance the productivity of mobile workforces without sacrificing data ownership, data privacy,… | N/A |
| Progress ShareFile | Triofox | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Discount available for annual pricing. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Progress ShareFile | Triofox |
|---|
| Progress ShareFile | Triofox | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| File Sharing & Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Security & Administration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Platform |
|
| Progress ShareFile | Triofox | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SugarSync Score 4.3 out of 10 | SugarSync Score 4.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.5 out of 10 | M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.5 out of 10 | M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Progress ShareFile | Triofox | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.3 (113 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 (8 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Usability | 6.5 (26 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Availability | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Performance | 9.1 (14 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 1.0 (14 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | 9.1 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Configurability | 6.5 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | 1.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | 1.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Progress ShareFile | Triofox | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| Pros | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| Cons | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| Usability | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| Performance | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| Scalability | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment | ![]() Progress ShareFile
| Gladinet, Inc No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | Progress ShareFile Screenshots |













