Silktide in Derby aims to give users everything they need to make their websites better, with automated accessibility testing, content optimization, and SEO-oriented digital marketing in one platform.
N/A
Surfer SEO
Score8.8 out of 10
N/A
SurferSEO, from Polish company Surfer, is presented as a modern tool for SEOs and marketers for efficient and comprehensive on-page SEO optimization.
$119
per month
Pricing
Silktide
Surfer SEO
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard
$119
per month
Pro
$219
per month
Peace of Mind
$359
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Silktide
Surfer SEO
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Discount available for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Features
Silktide
Surfer SEO
SEO
Comparison of SEO features of Silktide and Surfer SEO
Feature
Silktide
-
Ratings
Surfer SEO
8.1
3 Ratings
5% above category average
Keyword analysis
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Backlink management
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
SERP ranking tracking
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Page grader
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Competitive analysis
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Site audit / diagnostics
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Site recommendations
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Task management
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
SEO Channels
Comparison of SEO Channels features of Silktide and Surfer SEO
Feature
Silktide
-
Ratings
Surfer SEO
7.0
1 Ratings
8% below category average
Local SEO
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Mobile SEO
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Global SEO
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
SEO Platform & Account Management
Comparison of SEO Platform & Account Management features of Silktide and Surfer SEO
It is an outstanding resource for creating accessible websites or else to improve on accessibility for websites your organization already has. Although the price is a bit high, it is worth the investment. The user interface of this software has a good design, is not complicated to adopt, and has resources that help to understand the importance of accessibility in websites.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is essential to meet all accessibility standards on every website to make them suitable for all types of users that browse them. This is something that Silktide has proven to be instrumental in.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Semrush's content and page optimisation tool is quite poor; it's not in the same bracket as Surfer. Frase is a good alternative from a cost perspective (if not paying the AI writing functions), it's cheaper, and Frase's keyword/topic heatmaps are quite unique. Sufer has a better UI and a shorter learning curve. It has an advantage in that it offers internal linking recommendations, which Frase lacks. Surfer also has limited competitor analysis (backlinks and page speed), which Frase does not. Both tools allow you to choose the number of competitors on the SERPS
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info