ReadyAPI vs. Tigmat

ReadyAPI

Tigmat

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
ReadyAPI	Score 6.1 out of 10	N/A	ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro) is a REST and SOAP API functional testing tool that enables software developers, QA engineers, and manual testers to work together to create, maintain, and execute complex end-to-end API tests in their CI/CD pipelines without needing to code.	N/A
Tigmat	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Tigmat is a test automation tool used to record tests and run them without having to write a single line of code. Tigmat supports Web, Android, Android Web, and API applications. It provides both a Web Recorder and an Android Recorder, so users don’t have to bother with code, even though anything can be changed manually. Test Execution is supported on more than 60 Real Android Devices, Windows, Linux, Chrome, Firefox, and Edge for coverage. There is a free plan…	$0 per month

Pricing

ReadyAPI

Tigmat

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Free: $0
per month
Basic: $199
per month
Professional: $499
per month
Premium: $999
per month

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
ReadyAPI	Tigmat
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

each plan gives access to different Web Testing Minutes and Real Device Testing Minutes, Mobile Recorder Minutes and other differences.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	ReadyAPI	Tigmat
Considered Both Products	ReadyAPI Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI ReadyAPI stands out among all these tools except for the fact that it is a paid tool. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI Katalon studio doesn't have powerful features like Data-driven testing with different sources such as Excel, GRID, Groovy, etc. Parallel testing is not available. Import API definitions which are one of the important of ReadyAPI are also not there in Katalon studio. Reporting … Incentivized Helpful? MM Mohammed Mitha CTO (Chief Technical Officer) Chose ReadyAPI Each product has a different specialty. With ReadyAPI, it combines multiple specialties into one product and also allows a combination of other products within the Smartbear suite. With other products integration of multiple test, products are far more difficult and require … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI The pricing was very advantageous and the software publisher had sales offices in our city. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI I have not used any other API tools, (new to QA) and the company already had ReadyAPI in place when I started. Incentivized Helpful? Laura Graham LaRocca QA Manager Chose ReadyAPI ReadyAPI manages DataSources, Endpoints, and Environments much better than Postman. Postman is a little simpler implementation but has a Team Workspace that is powerful for Development handoffs and manual testing. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI Postman is simpler and super less expensive than ReadyAPI. In addition, the product continues to work even after the license has expired in comparison to ReadyAPI which requires you to purchase a new license every time. Is a turnoff. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI ReadyAPI is a comprehensive tool that allows for developing, validation, and testing all in one suite. There are advanced features like user simulation and assertion capabilities that set ReadyAPI apart from other tools in the same segment. We also have several legacy solutions … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI I have used a couple of products mentioned above. But the best thing about ReadyAPI is, it's a complete [package] for API testing. Not all software offers load testing, assertion, and reporting features. Also, lots of plugins, like Azure API Management, AWS API plugin features … Incentivized Helpful? SP Sheilagh Park-Hatley Director, SQA Chose ReadyAPI Postman didn't have the flexibility of detailed assertions that we needed, although it was easy to use. Also their integration points weren't as straightforward. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI ReadyAPI beats all other alternatives because of its support of all kinds of API types. Also, users can specify every flow and every step for every second to replicate every test case with ease. It also has GIT support with is a big plus. ReadyAPI is must have tool for API … Incentivized Helpful? HA Haroon Akmal Senior Quality Assurance Engineer Chose ReadyAPI POSTMAN! ReadyAPI's data generator feature is the reason behind choosing it against other products. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI 1. Less coding. 2. Easy to use. 3. Even people with less experience in coding can use it. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI The main competitor for ReadyAPI was Postman. It is much more lightweight, but that means you also get fewer features. ReadyAPI also provides an ecosystem in which you can have an entire lifecycle for your API, if that is what you want - and are willing to put in the work to … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI I am using ReadyAPI tools for more than two years helped us to evaluate the quality of our API. For all API Automation testing, load testing, and security testing ReadyAPI bring us the best result and quality. It has many useful features in automation that we use to do more … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI I didn't have much experience with automation in Postman, but ReadyAPI seems more robust and in my opinion is able to cover many use cases. For me it was also easier to write the tests in SoapUI as many times it is matter of clicking and copying existing things. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI I have not used other API testing products but I am completely satisfied with the functionality and performance of ReadyAPI. It covers all required API protocols and database connections that are used in our organization. It also allows extending the functionality by adding … Incentivized Helpful? Rashad Miriyev Software Quality Assurance Engineer Chose ReadyAPI Automating test cases is not functional in Postman, but in ReadyAPI you can do everything, even keyword driven development. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI ReadyAPI provides intuitive GUI capabilities compared to their own open source product. When compared to Postman, ReadyAPI also supports SOAP based services, which is a saver especially when integrating with legacy or other third party systems. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI SoapUI Pro is good because you can start automating functional testing even if you don't have scripting knowledge. However, it doesn't work very well with GraphQL and so we had to use Insomnia is those cases. Incentivized Helpful? Anthony Aziz Senior Software Engineer Chose ReadyAPI ReadyAPI vs Postman: ReadyAPI makes testing WSDL, SOAP, etc. much easier and quicker. Postman would require you to manually construct the SOAP envelopes and metadata XML, which is a lot of work for something that is meant to be a quick test. Incentivized Helpful? Birobrata Deb Specialist Software Engineer in QA & Automation Chose ReadyAPI It has many features including functional security testing. And it's known to be widely used. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI We have considered only Postman as an alternate option and ended up with Ready PI for its in built features like reporting and easy maintenance. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI We selected SoapUI because it generates tests easily using drag and drop, and point-and-click. It gives powerful data-driven testing with data from files and databases. Scripts can be reused easily. We had an extra option to integrate it directly with our build tool, Jenkins, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose ReadyAPI Our team did an extensive analysis of the products that were available to carry out API Testing. There were 3 products that were finalized, SoapUI Pro, Postman, and Katalon Studio, out of these 3 SoapUI was the clear winner. I can't stress enough about the SoapUI's UI … Incentivized Helpful?	Tigmat No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	ReadyAPI	Tigmat
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.4 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Selenium Score 8.3 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 6.1 out of 10
Enterprises	SoapUI Open Source Score 8.3 out of 10	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	ReadyAPI	Tigmat
Likelihood to Recommend	7.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	7.3 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	9.9 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Availability	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Performance	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	8.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	7.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	7.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	ReadyAPI	Tigmat
Likelihood to Recommend	As stated, we do a LOT of API testing, the swaggerhub import makes it easy to add APIs. This is very well-suited, as well as easy management of the steps/cases/suites inside of ReadyAPI. The one thing I do wish ReadyAPI was better suited for is changes to data, we have a lot of test cases in ReadyAPI and if we make a change to how the backend data is structured, one-by-one adjustments need to be made to the steps. Less appropriate, UI testing. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	SoapUI NG Pro is a prefect tool for setting up complicated test cases with many steps including parameterized Web Service requests, response assertions, data generators, data sources, data sinks (report recorders) and more You can use Groovy or JavaScript for more complicated automation such as validating the results, extracting data, using external Java libraries or running system processes. Groovy IDE is compatible with Java and you can easily write your code in Java with very few modifications. SoapUI enables you to run multiple test suites in parallel or in a loop, and provide user friendly reports including all test case results and test case coverage. SoapUI NG Pro lets you to perform security test against your web services with predefined scenarios such as xml bombing, xml injection, sql injection, buffer overflow tests, monkey testing and so on. SoapUI NG Pro, offers a simple but practical solution for low to medium load testing scenarios. You can obtain many more Load and Performance testing features by extending your license with purchasing LoadUI Pro. Incentivized Payam Pirooznia Senior Automation Test Engineer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	REST - They have come a long way, but there could still be improvements here. I find the learning curve much higher and not as straight forward using REST vs SOAP. Composite Projects - I'd really like to see them implement something around saving/refreshing Test Suites when using the Composite project ability in Pro. This is currently an enhancement in feature backlog (see their forum for more details). Functionality around Projects and Test Cases seems pretty sound. Natalie Colyer Lead Test Automation Engineer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew	I would definitely renew the ReadyAPI as I was pretty happy while using it. But then I switched my job, and the current workplace is using Postman so we are using it for now. Plus, I don't have any issues with Postman. At the end of the day, it about selecting the tool that gets your work done more efficiently. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	SoapUI allows us to combine multiple tests and adhere to the sequence that they need to run in order to complete successfully. It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing Christopher Saleh Lead QA Engineer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability	Soap UI has managed to continuously build on it's solid foundation and keep improving by each release. It is by far the most dependable and accurate testing tool out there of its kind. Available via connecting to VM's created as SoapUI test machines give access to it anytime, anywhere practically. Christopher Saleh Lead QA Engineer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Performance	It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing. Christopher Saleh Lead QA Engineer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Support Rating	For my purposes, the provided help features have been sufficient. I am sure I would be better off if I were to spend more time studying the app. For now, I load a project, connect, and execute. It just works. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating	no very easy but lacks documentation Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	I have not used other API testing products but I am completely satisfied with the functionality and performance of ReadyAPI. It covers all required API protocols and database connections that are used in our organization. It also allows extending the functionality by adding external DB drivers and wiring custom scripts when the native assertion/data manipulation test steps are not sufficient. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Scalability	It has an excellent GUI design and the reporting mechanism is also very good. It does consume a lot of memory though during concurrent testing. However, I have read that added monitoring tools have been added, which if so the 7 could possibly go to a 8 or 9. Christopher Saleh Lead QA Engineer Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	We were able to achieve our needs in API test automation with the tool In terms ROI, I would say that we have gotten what is basically needed Though the initial setup was tough, after that we were able to continue it with user friendly UI and reporting. Overall, it had [a] neutral impact in terms [of] ROI. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots		Tigmat Screenshots