Zephyr Enterprise vs. SpiraTest

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Zephyr Enterprise
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Zephyr Enterprise provides optimization, quality, speed, and processing of testing activities in a single tool. Other features include creating test cases, defining user requirements and generating reports.N/A
SpiraTest
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
SpiraTest allows customers to manage their software testing and quality assurance activities. It provides requirements management, test management and bug-tracking functionality with integrated reporting.
$130.99
per month 3 concurrent users (minimum)
Pricing
Zephyr EnterpriseSpiraTest
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Cloud
$43.66
per month per concurrent user
Download
$423.66
per year per concurrent user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Zephyr EnterpriseSpiraTest
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing information.Discount available for annual billing on Cloud solution. 3 concurrent user minimum. Volume concurrent user discount available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Zephyr EnterpriseSpiraTest
Features
Zephyr EnterpriseSpiraTest
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Zephyr Enterprise
9.3
1 Ratings
14% above category average
SpiraTest
7.8
8 Ratings
4% below category average
Centralized test management9.01 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Map tests to user stories9.01 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Test execution reporting9.01 Ratings5.08 Ratings
Defect management10.01 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Zephyr EnterpriseSpiraTest
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Zephyr EnterpriseSpiraTest
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(8 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Zephyr EnterpriseSpiraTest
Likelihood to Recommend
SmartBear
  1. Well suited for companies having several applications which need rigorous continuous testing cycles due to periodic upgrades to products/features.
  2. Ideally suited for use cases where there is a need to run sanity and regression suites very frequently.
  3. It is very helpful to have a traceability matrix across Stories/tasks and easy to link all the test cases to be covered to stories.
  4. Variety of reports for Quality Dashboard.
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
I think SpiraTest is well suited as a test suite, but in situations where the team is already using multiple products from one particular provider, it may be better to go with that provider's test solution. This is because integrations are very important nowadays, and should be considered when picking your project management software. It should be noted that management selected SpiraTest primarily due to the low cost of the test software. I'm less familiar with other test software in the field, but if cost is an issue, you should take a look at SpiraTest.
Read full review
Pros
SmartBear
  • Creation of Folders, Sub Folder and Releases for various Teams/Projects
  • Ability to create cycles and adding cases to these
  • Ability to copy/clone entire test cycles for regression/sanity needs
  • Linking of defects to Test Cases
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • A clean view of test case steps, expected results and the ability to record a result for each step quickly on one page per test set. This really helps testers work through executing manual test cases.
  • Hierarchical structure of releases and builds, requirements, and test cases.
  • Can quickly build test sets and/or test runs per build/release.
  • Simple identification of each test case, requirement, test run, build, release, etc.
Read full review
Cons
SmartBear
  • Better Test case Upload Utility
  • Ability to quickly map test cases from excel to JIRA fields
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • Training can be difficult to find at times.
  • Basic reporting can become very verbose unless you set lots of filters and parameters.
  • The ability to customize some of the verbiage in the application would help bridge the gap between translating what SpiraTest's testing terminology is and the company culture uses for testing terminology.
Read full review
Support Rating
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Inflectra Corporation
As promised during product selection, SpiraPlan support has always been quick and helpful. Replies almost always come back in hours (and often in an hour or two). And SpiraPlan's online tech support maintains all support conversations online so no need to look through emails to try to recall repllies.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SmartBear
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
Read full review
Return on Investment
SmartBear
  • Time saving and productivity enhancement for QA teams by preventing context and tool switching
  • High observability to management via QA Dashboards
Read full review
Inflectra Corporation
  • SpiraTest can be improved in terms of its dashboard and reporting. This will be really helpful for the management as well.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SpiraTest Screenshots

Screenshot of real-time dashboards.Screenshot of an example of the customizable reporting.Screenshot of requirements management.Screenshot of test management.