Tricentis qTest

Tricentis qTest

Tricentis qTest

73 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Tricentis qTest	Score 8.6 out of 10	N/A	Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.	$1,200 per year per user

Pricing

Tricentis qTest

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Tricentis qTest
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Request Pricing

Community Pulse
	Tricentis qTest
Considered Both Products	Tricentis qTest NT Navaneeth T QA Manager Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis qTest takes a lead on centralised maintenance of all entities of STLC & also qTest takes a big leap when it comes to Proof of testing data capture thru "web explorer" & also it got advantage for its easy configuration against any project management tool i.e. JIRA etc. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Manager Chose Tricentis qTest We found that Tricentis qTest and TestRail have some similarities, but the main problem was that we needed to use an existing shared instance of TestRail, and we discovered that there was no easy way to prevent users of other projects from editing or even accidentally deleting … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Partner Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis qTest ranks well among all test management platforms. For smaller teams with less activity or reporting requirements, qTest can be overkill. However, as organizations evolve and become more scrutinized or chaotic, qTest is one of, if not, the best option to ensure all … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Tricentis qTest qTest was in general easier to use and more intuitive in its layout Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Tricentis qTest I have used HP AlM, Redmine , ADO in past and I loved qTest for its ability to integrate with CI tool , automation frameworks and Jira. Incentivized Helpful? Ketal Parikh Principal Consultant Chose Tricentis qTest As I am not the actual decision maker of which tool to purchase. I have always liked the Tricentis qTest tool. Decision has been made by the top management, The tool has proven is value and for the Same reason it is still being used. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Project Manager Chose Tricentis qTest Open option for automation testing & easy to set up. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose Tricentis qTest Still evaluating. TestRail seems to be a far better solution but we need to solve migration issues. Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Tricentis qTest looking at the positive features like 3rd party integration, the Tricentis qTest stacks up along with providing the custom build and event driven workflows with open-source solutions (Azure, DevOps, Teams etc). Manages and schedule automated testing along with creating report … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Professional Chose Tricentis qTest All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Analyst Chose Tricentis qTest Value for moneyBest in classAll the feature which other tool are havingBest defect management systemCollaboration can be done in the best manner Helpful? Mahathee Dandibhotla Project Lead Quality Chose Tricentis qTest Extensive integration options with various third-party tools, enabling seamless integration into existing workflows. Allows for flexibility and customization of workflows, fields, and permissions to adapt to unique testing requirements. Supports robust requirements traceability, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Consultant Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis is easy to use and user friendly. Less time consuming with lot of good utilities. And for better test management. qTest also stacks up better than the above tools due to its efficiency, test case interface and test execution interface. Excellent comments area and … Incentivized Helpful? Nikhil Puniyani Senior Software Engineer In Test Chose Tricentis qTest - It was not our decision to use qTest as a tool, as this was a management decision. - Since I have used many Test Management Tools I can compare for e.g The Reporting and Statistics in qTest is very impressive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Employee Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis qtest is well suited as it serves the purpose for both quality assurance and business management. It is very simple for non technical users to write test cases in free hand and they don’t have to bother about traceability as it is automatically handled by this … Incentivized Helpful? KUMAR PRANAY PATRA QA ENGINEER Chose Tricentis qTest I have worked on Jira, but i found it more difficult interface to handle. It was not user friendly. The defect management was also not impressive. qTest experience actually helped me to take decision while evaluating. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Team Lead Chose Tricentis qTest I'm not the decision maker, so I can't provide objective comparison criteria, but I can say that Tricentis QTest is a reliable tool for Test Management. Incentivized Helpful? EH Ed Hein Sr. Manager, Digital Product Excellence Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis was better suited to our processes, tools integration and migration of data from our prior tool set. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose Tricentis qTest Didn’t have the same ease of use for us and didn’t integrate as well into our test process. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Director Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis qTest provides a neater package, with easier test execution and better integration with our other tools. Incentivized Helpful? AT Adrian Tang Senior Manager, Software Quality Assurance Chose Tricentis qTest Prior to qTest, the teams were using TestLink. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Engineer Chose Tricentis qTest The main tool we compared to Tricentis qTest Explorer was the "Steps Recorder" that comes with Windows. We selected Tricentis qTest Explorer because, at least at the time, Steps Recorder would sometimes skip recording arbitrary steps, which didn't meet our needs. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Tricentis qTest

Test Management

Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
	Tricentis qTest 8.1 37 Ratings 0% above category average
Centralized test management	8.036 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules	8.231 Ratings
Map tests to user stories	7.78 Ratings
Test execution reporting	8.736 Ratings
Defect management	7.831 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Tricentis qTest
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 9.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Tricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend	8.6 (39 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	6.0 (2 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	1.0 (1 ratings)
Implementation Rating	5.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Tricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend	Tricentis Tricentis qTest integrates seamlessly with Jira, making it ideal for teams that manage user stories and defects in Jira while keeping test cases and execution in qTest. When paired with automation tools like tosca, Selenium, or WebdriverIO, qTest is excellent for aggregating both manual and automated test results in one place. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Tricentis As a fresher, when I started using qTest it was very handy and easy to understand. It helps us trace the test cases that are used to test the quality in a single location The main thing is its integration with JIRA as soon as we create a ticket we would be getting all the requirements in the qTest so it became easy for me Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Tricentis In requirements , we can't add multiple test cases at once, or search multiple cases at once, need to do one by one. Here actually qtest needs to improve. Linking cloud hosted qtest and on-premise TOSCA is very difficult especially when you are working with client system with security wall. It requires tunnelling software which is not recommended. Incentivized KUMAR PRANAY PATRA QA ENGINEER Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Tricentis This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon). Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Tricentis qTest is actually intuitive and user-friendly, despite my other scathing review aspects Incentivized Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support Read full review
Support Rating	Tricentis The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional Incentivized Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support Read full review
Implementation Rating	Tricentis Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better Incentivized Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Tricentis All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, user-centric interface contrasts with ALM's more dated appearance and complex setup. While TestRail provides a clean user experience and caters to a broad spectrum of business, qTest's scalability, from SMBs to large enterprises, stands out. PractiTest's cloud-based solution is geared towards mid-sized companies, but qTest's flexibility, advanced analytics, and robust reporting grant teams actionable insights. qTest' approach to a more holistic test management closely aligning with modern software development practices Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Tricentis In comparison to other Testing tools, Tricentis qTest was the most expensive. We were able to quickly bring international users up to speed on how to use the tool. The ability to clone a project rather than create a new one from scratch was a valuable time saver. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Tricentis qTest Screenshots