Tungsten Capture vs. Tungsten OmniPage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Tungsten Capture
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Tungsten Capture (formerly Kofax Capture) is a suite of multichannel document capture applications.
$3,500
per year
Tungsten OmniPage
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Tungsten Omnipage, formerly from Kofax, is optical character recognition (OCR) software that allows users to digitally edit documents. As OCR software, it allows users to scan in physical documents and turn them into digital files.
$149
one-time fee per desktop license
Pricing
Tungsten CaptureTungsten OmniPage
Editions & Modules
Kofax Capture
$3,500
per year
OmniPage Standard 18.0
$149
one-time fee per license
OmniPage Ultimate 19.2
$499
one-time fee per license
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Tungsten CaptureTungsten OmniPage
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsOmniPage Ultimate and Standard are perpetual licenses - buy once, own forever. No subscription or maintenance fees. OmniPage Server and CSDK are enterprise level products - contact sales for a free quote
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Tungsten CaptureTungsten OmniPage
Best Alternatives
Tungsten CaptureTungsten OmniPage
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Foxit PDF Editor
Foxit PDF Editor
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
Conga Composer
Conga Composer
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Tungsten CaptureTungsten OmniPage
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(9 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Tungsten CaptureTungsten OmniPage
Likelihood to Recommend
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Kofax [Capture] meets our needs and for the most part is easy to use and setup. Configuration could be a little bit easier. The scripting language is a double edge sword if you will. It gives you nearly unlimited possibilities to script what you need, but the downside is you have to script it. Does a good job at batching and scanning documents. The tool integrates well into our workflow which makes our business partners happy and in turn provides for happy customers.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
I use it for nearly every application to import from scanner or file. Kofax PDF Create is my option for direct document to pdf import.
Read full review
Pros
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • The VRS application included with Kofax Capture is the best image pre-processing platform available on the market today. It can handle a wide array of common document problems such as skew, flipping, wrinkles, lines, and dots.
  • The platform is incredibly scriptable and can be customized to handle all sorts of unusual document contents to allow information to be extracted that many other platforms just struggle on. Table extraction, line item matching, and smart extraction are all strong points with this platform.
  • Through the use of SBL and .NET the platform can be expanded and scaled quite easily to allow for the software to be integrated into existing business processes and platforms with ease.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • High percentage accuracy of OCR.
  • Scan and create fillable documents.
  • Import images to be processed from file folders.
Read full review
Cons
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • We struggled with configuring Kofax with AP Automation. We used to receive vouchers in different formats by different companies, by different departments. The people from different departments used to scan those vouchers through regular scanners to a central location, which ended up as image pdfs. We fed these image pdfs through Kofax Capture for character recognition, which was painful as the accuracy of recognition was 50 to 60%.
  • Having a connectors with a workflow tool would be helpful where people can validate and approve the output.
  • More samples and documentation related to use of API in .NET applications would be a good improvement, that would help users to adapt the product easily into their organization.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Usability
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
It's good.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Haven't really used their support yet
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Quality of data capture. Automatic data integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic image integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic invoice booking in Oracle and SAP ERP.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
I use both.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.
Read full review
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • Best value for its capability.
  • Fast throughput.
  • Accuracy.
Read full review
ScreenShots