Unanet AE, replacing the former Clearview inFocus acquired by Unanet, is a project-based business platform purpose-built to help A&E Project Managers, Finance Leaders and Executives drive profitability.
N/A
Workamajig
Score7.6 out of 10
N/A
Workamajig is a project management system with capabilities such as file sharing, resource management, and revenue projection.
$41
per month per user
Pricing
Unanet ERP for AE
Workamajig
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
In-house
$41
per month per user
Agency
$41
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Unanet ERP for AE
Workamajig
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Unanet ERP for AE
Workamajig
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
10.0
1 Ratings
29% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
8.7
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
7.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
10.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
7.9
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Dashboards
7.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
10.0
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
10.0
1 Ratings
23% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Credit card processing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
10.0
2 Ratings
28% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Billing Management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
10.0
2 Ratings
35% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
10.0
1 Ratings
34% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
10.0
1 Ratings
31% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Forecasting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
10.0
1 Ratings
30% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
Feature
Unanet ERP for AE
-
Ratings
Workamajig
4.9
13 Ratings
44% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
5.513 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
6.16 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
5.011 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
4.011 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
5.013 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
3.07 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
3.07 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
4.013 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
5.510 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
1.08 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
8.011 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
4.08 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.010 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Unanet ERP for AE and Workamajig
All of our accounting needs, from Accounts Receivable tools and Accounts Payable have been able to be met and exceeded by the automation tools that Unanet ERP for AE has implemented. Less appropriate is use for Business Development and marketing, of which we have an additional external system to use as a resource.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you're looking for a system to help you address accounting that's not suited for marketing agency structures, this is the right tool. It is a bit cumbersome, but it has streamlined our reporting, billing, estimating, and tracking. As for project management, it's great that it integrates with the estimating and finances, but it's just not enjoyable to use. The interface is clunky. So if project management is your main criteria, I'd choose something else. We would never use it to collaborate with clients either because I'd be afraid of making them frustrated by the tool, so we use Basecamp to do that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The Platinum version has a particularly robust time tracking system, down to a 'timer' function that can be critical for an agency like mine where you want to be accountable for billing a client arruately
The ability to make projects available only to those who are permitted to assign their time to it has apparently been very helpful during our revenue reconciliation meetings where time incurred is reviewed against scope
The mobile app, while I still feel needs some work, is pretty handy for a quick calendar check if I'm in a client meeting and cannot utilize my browser to get information
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
WMJ's interface is dated. Despite an html5 driven "sheets"-based interface, it takes a lot of time and effort to manage the interface, which could be streamlined considerably. On a UX/UI scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, WMJ would earn a 6 from me.
Despite the amount of documentation available, there is a distinct lack of clarity in that documentation, and it doesn't fully cover everything you would expect. Branching thoughts, for instance, are not addressed. Additionally, because there are two editions of the software online, there are two support sites that aren't sequestered. So information from both commingles, creating confusion.
Support is available on an email and phone basis. They strongly encourage you to use email, however, and they are resistant to phone time. This is likely because the support staff is limited in number, but has a great depth of knowledge. If you want immediate phone support, however, YOU ARE OUT OF LUCK. You are placed in a queue and the odds of same-day help are low. For email, the response is usually within an hour, but when you are stuck with a configuration issue, or need to generate a report and don't know how to do something, waiting is not optimal. That said, the support team is TERRIFIC.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I rate Unanet high because overall, it is good at what it does. It is user-friendly, allows my organization to bill properly, and is easily adapted by our staff. The drawbacks of Unanet are that its interface is outdated and it is lacking some reporting options. It also has some small issues regarding timesheets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workamajig was selected over a decade ago when there were very few project management platforms that has integrations with other platforms, support for Agile, KanBan, etc etc. Most of the other offerings did not offer the type of security available with us hosting an on premises server behind a VPN although now there are plenty of cloud based solutions that have security compliance greater than what we can provide (fedRamp, etc.)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The agency switched to an hourly allocation so our clients were subject to a certain amount of hours each quarter. JIG helped us keep track of who was going over hours or who had some to spare. Once the clients went over we would use JIG to help charge the additional fees for going over. It helped keep clients accountable.
It was used to keep track of time sheets and through those time sheets, the directors were able to make a case for more employees on certain accounts. The corporate team hired 3 additional people that were truly needed and our time sheets helped reflect that.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info