Vena vs. Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Vena
Score 8.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.N/A
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
A platform designed to deliver quick, accurate budgets, custom forecasts and valuations, that sends users precise budget projections for rents, recoveries, charges, concessions and retail overage figures.N/A
Pricing
VenaYardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
Editions & Modules
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
VenaYardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsThe Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal. Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services. For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs. Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
VenaYardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
Considered Both Products
Vena
Chose Vena
Vena is much more user friendly but Python does allow for more custom reporting
Chose Vena
Prior to using Vena, I have worked with Excel-based budgeting and reporting processes, as well as other property management and financial reporting systems such as Yardi and Entrata. These tools provided access to financial data, but Vena has been more focused on streamlining …
Chose Vena
We went with Vena as the alternatives felt like everything was contained in the box, and would have required more IT department assistance than we had bandwidth for.
Chose Vena
Vena is much better for customization and data representation. It gives us much more flexibility in how we show our information to stakeholders. We need our information to be digestible for non-financial employees, and with that flexibility to show things how we want, we are …
Chose Vena
we did our diligence when selecting Vena. I do not want to disparage other products so I will not list them. However, we were extremely thorough and gauged all offerings on multiple criteria. Big players and small players. We are very happy with our Decision to go with Vena.
Chose Vena
Oracle is more clunky and prone to stats breaking while Vena is more streamlined.
Chose Vena
Solver was more user friendly in the report building, but Vena has more functionalities
Chose Vena
My experience was that OneStream lacked driver-based planning. I still had to build models in excel and then upload my numbers into OneStream.
Chose Vena
Vena was much easier to implement, and more user friendly
Chose Vena
Vena has a much more arsenal of AI features.
Chose Vena
we liked that Vena was fully integrated into Excel and we were already doing all our manual work within excel and creating all our reports and templates so we thought that only made sense to use Vena as it was most comfortable for us
Chose Vena
We selected Vena due to it being Excel based.
Chose Vena
I think from the finance perspective specifically, Vena is more clear and easy to read. Besides, the report that Vena generates is more reliable and realistic in our case. But we do integrate the data from Workday to Vena every month. So we use the both platforms for our …
Chose Vena
We selected Vena because the product worked in Excel, so there was less of a training curve for people, because all of other people work with cell users and we also chose it better because of the people, the sales reps, and the implementation teams. You know, the processes that …
Chose Vena
Vena is Excel-based, which is what our users wanted. Pigment was web-based, like Adaptive, but our users did not fully trust or adopt it. Adoption drives success for any software. Amy's software, which is not adopted, has a negative ROI by definition. Vena was the right choice …
Chose Vena
Playful is complex and not user friendly. There was no customer support so we had to pay a third party consultant and it was expensive
Chose Vena
Vena has more capabilities that we saw during demos
Chose Vena
The main reason was because Vena was Excel based and would allow us to replicate our budget templates and limit the change management for our users
Chose Vena
Vena is more customizable in my opinion
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting

No answer on this topic

Features
VenaYardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Vena
7.9
Ratings
4% above category average
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Vena
8.0
Ratings
3% above category average
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Vena
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
-
Ratings
Publish to Web7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Vena
8.2
Ratings
10% above category average
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Vena
8.4
Ratings
0% below category average
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Vena
7.2
Ratings
3% below category average
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Vena
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
-
Ratings
Long-term financial planning8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial budgeting8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Forecasting8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Scenario modeling7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Management reporting8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Vena
7.2
Ratings
8% below category average
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
-
Ratings
Financial data consolidation7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Journal entries and reports6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency management6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Minority Ownership5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Vena
8.3
Ratings
5% above category average
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
-
Ratings
Financial Statement Reporting8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Reporting8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Vena
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
-
Ratings
Personalized dashboards8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
KPIs8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Vena
8.1
Ratings
0% below category average
Yardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
-
Ratings
Flat file integration7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel data integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
VenaYardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
VenaYardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
VenaYardi Advanced Budgeting & Forecasting
Likelihood to Recommend
It’s great for achieving flexible outcomes amid ever-changing desires among its user base. We have not implemented AI into our finances quite yet, but this seems very promising for working more efficiently in analysis and narrative prep. It works great for constant real-time data and allows us to make decisions on the fly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • The Admin function of Vena, being able to set up the users in the user categories and the different groups and assigning the groups and the task bindings, is particularly easy and very helpful because as we have so many different departments and disciplines in our organization, we do need to establish pretty specific user access so this process works really well for us.
  • Running reports in Vena is fairly easy, and we do enjoy being able to just push a button and get some budget versus actuals.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Create an bottom-line functionality.
  • Have another license between power user and contributor that allows building reports that aren't ad hoc, but don't have all the admin rights of a power user.
  • Have a session on best in class Workforce Planning prior to implementation.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Vena has become an integral part of finance and our daily process. Without it we would take longer to prepare results and decisions will be delayed. Vena has given the whole organization more visibility of results and budgets so that all departments participate more actively in managing their budgets rather than it being the sole responsibility of finance.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I would rate Vena's overall usability as an 8 out of 10. Vena offers a user-friendly interface, especially for those familiar with Excel, making it relatively easy to use. Most features are intuitive. However, some advanced functionalities may require more training or time to master, so it's not a perfect score. Overall, Vena provides a solid user experience that supports efficient financial planning.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Vena is seemingly always available. They plan maintenance windows well in advance and always off hours (typically over a weekend) and communicate clearly throughout maintenance about what will be affected. Over 5 years of using the product, I can only remember one time when the platform was unavailable (I believe due to an underlying server hosting issue from their provider), and they resolved the issue and had everything up and running again within 8 hours.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
The performance is dependent on how much data and calculations are involved and how complex the security settings are. A simple template or report loads in seconds. A complex template or report can take a while. If there are many users with complex security settings, that will be a factor in the load time.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Their general support is pretty responsive (max 24 hours) but when you work directly through one of their CSMs then the response time can be much faster. If you purchase coaching hours then you can get things sorted out pretty quick. Over time you learn the software and need support less, but it's always helpful to have it ready when you need it
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
This is the best way to learn and buy-in. The in person effect gives students both a hands on approach but an instruction to be there to customize assistance and understanding. In person also builds greater buy in with your future team on creators. However if your audience is better at on line learning this is another good option.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Prior to using Vena, I have worked with Excel-based budgeting and reporting processes, as well as other property management and financial reporting systems such as Yardi and Entrata. These tools provided access to financial data, but Vena has been more focused on streamlining budgeting, forecasting, and variance analysis by centralizing information and improving collaboration.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Automated monthly financial statements saves us 3 hours a month.
  • Moving reporting away from IT has begun to save hours of IT involvement, which will only grow as we shift more reports to Vena. This frees up IT to work on more important IT initiatives.
  • Using budget templates saved hours of copy and paste time when gathering inputs from each department.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Vena Screenshots

Screenshot of Operation Expenses - Predictive AnalysisScreenshot of Allocations DashboardScreenshot of Vena Add InScreenshot of Power BI DashboardScreenshot of Operational Expenses - Drill through analysisScreenshot of Process Status Dashboard