VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud vs. Windows Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud brings together VMware vSphere, vSAN, and NSX into a natively-integrated stack of virtual compute, virtual storage, and virtual networking built upon IBM Bluemix bare metal servers.N/A
Windows Server
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Pricing
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM CloudWindows Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM CloudWindows Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM CloudWindows Server
Features
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM CloudWindows Server
Server Virtualization
Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
9.0
1 Ratings
12% above category average
Windows Server
-
Ratings
Virtual machine automated provisioning9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Management console9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Live virtual machine backup9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Live virtual machine migration9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Hypervisor-level security9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating System
Comparison of Operating System features of Product A and Product B
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud
-
Ratings
Windows Server
8.0
1 Ratings
9% below category average
File Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Software Application Management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
System Update Frequency00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Operating System Security00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM CloudWindows Server
Small Businesses
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.4 out of 10
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM CloudWindows Server
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(63 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(6 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(7 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(19 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM CloudWindows Server
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Multiple capabilities that VMware Cloud Foundation on IBM Cloud provides are excellent and very much involved in secure data migration and management, easy to monitor server performance and the virtual capability is on top and the data analytics using the platform are provided in real-time and the reports are the most useful, especially on the critical situations within the business development.
Read full review
Microsoft
Windows is well-suited for environments where caretakers are not as technical as they are in larger environments. It is also well-suited for small environments where a small number of server instances can provide a complete enterprise management solution, including directory services (AD), networking services (DHCP, DNS), file server services, printing, and hosting of applications that the enterprise relies on. It is also fairly good at providing hybrid-cloud support (most especially with Azure).
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Dashboard understanding is easy.
  • The ability to handle big data.
  • Data extraction tools are very active.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Backup of workstations & itself - reliably, consistently, with Bare-Metal Restore and deduplication
  • File management and Security on a per file/folder/user basis is simple and fully done through an easy GUI
  • DNS, DHCP server functions are easy to configure using the built-in GUI
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Only setting the advanced functionalities.
  • The basic knowledge can not full manipulate the platform.
  • To create reports for big data is sometime very turf.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Microsoft needs to minimize the update frequency by making the product more secure. It can become very exhausting trying to keep updated if you don't have a dedicated support team. It can become challenging where the business is unable to allow downtime for reboots as part of the update process.
  • Prone to security and audit vulnerabilities.
  • The operating system needs more CPU and memory resources compared to other options such as Linux.
  • Understanding the licensing model can be abit confusing.
  • Comes with a standard firewall, but not the most secured one available. Would suggest using a more secured firewall as part of your antivirus software.
  • Due to the number of vulnerabilities and the operating system being a target for hackers, anti-virus software is a must.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I've carefully reviewed the servers and services currently running on Windows Server 2012, and given the opportunity would renew them as is going forward. There are two systems I currently have in place, one is a very large Linux implementation for a large ecommerce site, and one is a very large backup solution front ended by FTP servers running Linux. Neither are well suited for Windows, but the overall network infrastructure is and will be Windows Server for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
There are simply too many different parts of Windows Server to make it a cohesive piece of software. While some of the newer features found in Windows Server 2012 and 2016 have nice UIs that are logically laid out, there are enough parts of the system that is still based on old code with clunky UIs and confusing options to make Windows Server a particularly user-friendly experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
some times server hungs and user sessions were busy to connect
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
need to improve the performance more
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Microsoft's support is hugely wide-ranging from articles online to having to contact them directly for the more serious issues. In recent years when I have contacted them directly, I have found the support o be excellent as I have found myself connected to very knowledgeable people in the field in which I needed the support. The online support available is vast and I tend to find most of the time that there is always someone out there who has had the same issue as me in the past and knows something about how to resolve it! This is the advantage of using industry standard and long-established systems such as Windows Server.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
it was my senior who trained Windows Server features and i was satisfied
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
it was recorded session and useful
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Make sure that you have detailed processes in place for every server instance you plan to install/upgrade, if possible get the base OS loaded and Windows Updates applied ahead of time, and if using a VM take a snapshot prior to installing each role, as well as along the way.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I didn't use any other system which gives the same functionality and I am not aware of any. The full integration between all components and especially the ability to integrate mail via Exchange or even via a hybrid setup with the Ofice365 cloud, including the ability to directly manage the cloud from the server, using Power Shell, is something I didn't see anywhere else.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
need to reduce a lot
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
yes i completely agree multi deployment
Read full review
Professional Services
IBM
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
i like the professional service but need to improve
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Live virtual capability are excellent.
  • Great tool for the huge volume of data management and migration.
  • Data accessibility is faster and the analytical capability is amazing.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Ability to keep all files in one place and give access to users makes file management easy to control.
  • VPN Access to off-site users is a plus.
  • Secure access to on-site SQL data from our accounting and estimating data is a plus.
Read full review
ScreenShots