ActiveBatch Workload AutomationPricing

They have Improved the efficiency They have brought down overall cost They have worked on accuracy

Improvement in Permission model Trigger Option needs to be enhanced. not at affordable price for smaller corporates GUI can be improved … smaller organizations due to the pricing and other automation softwares that are available in market at a lesser price. the beginners may…

Cost cutting has happened Task has been made simpler Efficiency has been increased

Saves time and effort leading to cost optimization

everything good compares to other software, in terms of set up, in terms of cost, in terms of end number of options which is required for any organization

hefty up-front expenses including licencing, instruction, and consultancy fees, which could have a short-term negative impact on ROI.

optimising resource use using ctiveBatch. Users may concentrate on high-value activities rather than boring, repetitive labour using automated workflows

the need for manual intervention and human mistake, resulting in time and cost savings. It also provides real-time monitoring and warnings, which aids us

Active Batch, allowing our teams to focus on higher-priority items. The annual cost of Active Batch as a solution is fairly high.

clients were on the verge of leaving us. We had daily SLA violations that cost us dearly. ActiveBatch Workload Automation rescued us!

those resources available. It is also somewhat costly - not in terms of value, but possibly beyond the reasonable budget of a small company or non-profit

sanity, from having to manually run tasks at certain times. Cost is not overly expensive, considering the amount of platforms it integrates with "out of

maybe SQL Server Agent or something smaller and less powerful (and less expensive) than ActiveBatch would work just fine.