TrustRadius: an HG Insights company
AWS Backup Logo

AWS Backup Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 8.9 out of 10
Score
8.9 out of 10

Reviews

12 Reviews

AWS backup - Improving Service for short term needs.

Rating: 7 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Short-term retention backups for Production, Development, and UAT are used for backups that do not require long-term monthly archiving.

Pros

  • Centralized management - single pane of glass to manage backups for multiple AWS services.
  • Encryption - integrates with KMS to encrypt backup data at rest and in transit.
  • Cross Account management - manage backups across multiple AWS accounts with AWS organizations.

Cons

  • Lacks built-in features for granular recovery, such as files or DB records, without restoring the entire backup.
  • Complexity - managing backups with multiple rules and resources, with limitations on the number of tags and resources per plan.
  • D/R recovery orchestration - does not offer advanced D/R orchestration.

Likelihood to Recommend

Because it is a native AWS service, it integrates well with all AWS services. However, it lacks the ability to manage long-term archive backups.

Vetted Review
AWS Backup
2 years of experience

AWS Backup the one and only tool you need to keep all safe in AWS

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We rely on AWS Backup to keep all our resources backed up, whether they be EC2 instances or RDS/Aurora Clusters. We can keep all resources backed up with a plan an retention policies. AWS Backup allows restores easily keeping all the metadata so the restored resource is exactly as the original resource.

Pros

  • Back up almost any resource in AWS Backup, EC2, RDS, DynamoDB, S3, etc
  • Restore the resource leaving it identical to the original
  • Works with AWS Organization so you can cover all your AWS accounts with a single Plan

Cons

  • Restoring the compute nodes of the cluster should be done always
  • Having the default Roles all the necessary permission, you have to add some depending on your configurations
  • Being able to see the Jobs status in a centralize account more graphically

Likelihood to Recommend

AWS Backup is well suited for any environment on AWS where you need to protect your resources from disasters, whether human or hardware/software. If you have on-premises resources is not the best option as AWS Backup is not able to copy all your information from the physical/virtual resources, there are other services for that.

AWS BACKUP REVIEW.

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

AWS Backup helps us to take a code Backup automatically, and we can plan the Backup schedules.

Pros

  • It is a centralized cloud storage system so we can access easily.
  • Stores the data in encrypted format.
  • Scheduling the backup is easy.

Cons

  • Cost is higher.
  • Backup architecture can be improved.
  • Recovery time should be reduced.

Likelihood to Recommend

AWS backup is widely famous and recommended across IT people for storing the codes and taking back the Database at scheduled time intervals. It makes IT people's lives easier.

Vetted Review
AWS Backup
5 years of experience

A reliable back-up solution for DR

Rating: 7 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

In line with other backup solutions for the cloud (from third parties), we have used AWS Backup as a PoC for multiple web application servers.

Pros

  • Centralized backup tool built OOTB by Amazon themselves.
  • Easy backup operations.
  • Relatively easy to use/learn.

Cons

  • Pricing
  • Documentation

Likelihood to Recommend

Well suited for DR scenarios, especially in scenarios with multiple applications web servers are required to be backed up.

Vetted Review
AWS Backup
1 year of experience

AWS is a reliable, easy off-site backup solution.

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

The whole organization uses AWS Backup to ensure our important files are kept safe. It [has] saved my butt a few times with a few poorly chosen delete commands. Our cloud providers offers a backup solution but they don't guarantee the location of the data. A fire at their data center could result in the loss of our data, so we chose AWS for our offsite solution.

We also suffered a complete loss of data at our cloud providers and despite their best attempts to get the files back, we had to rely on our backups at AWS to get our services back up and running.

We've also implemented AWS [Backup] for a few of our customers looking for offsite backups.

Pros

  • Redundant
  • Offsite
  • Upload and forget
  • Easy retrieval

Cons

  • Some parts of the user interface can be a bit daunting

Likelihood to Recommend

There is a cost involved with data retrieval. AWS Backup is truly that, a backup. If you need to access this data on a regular basis, there are better options out there.

For long term, just in case incremental backups, AWS [Backup] checks all the boxes. Just set it up, start your backups, and rest assured your data is safe.

Vetted Review
AWS Backup
7 years of experience

AWS Backup--automate the backup of your AWS services

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

AWS Backup is used as the main backup solution for the core of our system (which is based on AWS infrastructure). AWS Backup is used mainly to back up our servers--and some important data--on regularly scheduled backups. This solution enables us to centralize and automate the backup of all of our AWS services (EBS volumes, EFS file systems, and databases).

Pros

  • It does what it supposed to do--backs up data
  • Almost a full solution to disaster recovery
  • Integrates with AWS services

Cons

  • Not so easy to use
  • A little pricey
  • The backup is in the cloud; make sure to keep an offline backup (the problem of all of this kind of solution)

Likelihood to Recommend

Backing up your AWS infrastructure and services can be simplified by using AWS Backup, as it provides features to support multiple services. The backup plans can be defined using JSON files (not straightforward) and you can use tags to identify the resources that you need to back up. The main advantage is that all the backups are in one place and that you can see your backup status using AWS Backup dashboard.

Vetted Review
AWS Backup
2 years of experience

Pricy, but worth it

Rating: 6 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We used AWS [Backup] as a backup for each server we have. Our data retention policies are fairly strong, and we keep about 3 months of backups in our services. AWS [Backup] was always some of the fastest and most efficient storage I've ever received. We were able to store lots and lots of backups with no problems. Never had an issue uploading either.

Pros

  • Backups - it's what it does.

Cons

  • Unable to organize folders. Maybe this is just something basic, but I was unable to move files around. I was doing everything manually, on the AWS site to no avail.

Likelihood to Recommend

AWS [Backup] does what it intends on doing. AWS [Backup] is very fast, however, for that speed, you'll end up with a high bill at the end of the month. Compared to competitors, AWS [Backup] is a lot more expensive than others. However, I believe it makes it up in it's versatility - there's no company more compatible with others than AWS.

A single place for your backups

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Basically we use AWS Backup to complete the cycle of lifetime backups, and also for centraliz[ing] those backups in one place. In first place we used just AMI backups, but when AWS release this service was amazing for us, because we can tag all resource that we want backup for.

Pros

  • tag select
  • backup voults
  • Backup plans

Cons

  • add more services to support aws backups
  • optimized the total size of backups (used one)
  • try to make previews of backups

Likelihood to Recommend

<div>centralized backups in one simple service and place, and for those environments with a big sizes of instances.</div><div>its not appropriate when you use try to test some unique instance and you don't need a real retention period for backups. Its totally recommended for RDS environments to improve the existent backups

</div>

Backup solution for integrated AWS workflows

Rating: 7 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

AWS Backup is being used by my project as a method to make regularly scheduled backups of data from various services. It is being used just by the project at this point but it addresses the business problem of disaster recovery and having the capability to restore data that was deleted by accident that may be critical or customer facing.

Pros

  • Data backup.
  • Disaster recovery.

Cons

  • Interface.
  • Documentation.

Likelihood to Recommend

AWS Backup is great for data backup because it solves a lot of data integrity and disaster recovery issues as a centralized backup tool on the Amazon platform. This is really only good if you use AWS as your main infrastructure organization. It is less appropriate in cases where you have data from other systems not covered by AWS.

Vetted Review
AWS Backup
2 years of experience

AWS Backup service

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use AWS Backup to simplify backup tasks of all our workloads in AWS.

Pros

  • Easy backup tasks definition and operation.
  • Automated configuration management from API.
  • Centralized management of backup plans per account.

Cons

  • Pricing.
  • Centralized management across multiple accounts.

Likelihood to Recommend

Backing up cloud workloads can be simplified by using AWS Backup as it provides features to support multiple services. Backup plans can be defined easily by json files and it's great to use tags to identify the resources to be backed up. The dashboard helps a lot with information to audit backup and restore activity.