Cisco Meraki MS Reviews and Ratings

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Meraki switches are easy to deploy in a network and can be managed from anywhere once it is online on cloud. We generally use Meraki switches as core switch to segregate traffic as per our requirement by implementing static route and also restricting traffic through ACL. Meraki PoE switches are easy for using with Access points as power requirement for those APs are easily fulfilled through it.

Likelihood to Recommend

Meraki switches are well suited for the environment like retail and small offices and schools and it is highly recommended to avoid using it in enterprise environment where so many complex configuration are required and many of those are not supported on the Meraki switches although day by day Meraki is giving new feature to its switches

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

At some locations we use Meraki full stack, so we have a variety of switch for core and access layers. But at almost every other location we use them only to split the WAN service between 2 routers. For this we use a basic 8 port switch, which is all we need for this purpose.

Likelihood to Recommend

These switches are great for quick and easy deployments. If you have people with little knowledge about networking, they won't struggle to maintain and operate these devices. An experienced network engineer could quickly start noticing issues, like lack of logging management (you cannot enable/disable logs) or the need of the switch to have a connection to Meraki cloud in order to be able to manage it.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

The Cisco Meraki MS platform is easy to configure, manage, and utilize. The GUI has a great desktop experience for all users.

Likelihood to Recommend

These devices are great for our environment and have been reliable over the years. Quick and easy to setup and configure.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

The fact that it team is a very Small team and increasing number of remote sites to support new business ventures and new locations, without ht need of local teams everywhere to support these functions

Likelihood to Recommend

The best scenario is When the it team is a very Small team and increasing number of remote sites to support new business ventures and on the other side, when you have a large team with many automation already in place and can cut costs on new licensing iin that way.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Company has several access points distributed in different contact center and business customer agents, and to be able to manage all from a single console and give internet to the clients and offices. Have complete control and administration of the contact centers, permitting easy control. Allowing and easy way to add new devices or replace all ones

Likelihood to Recommend

Best suited with several access points distributed in different contact center and business customer agents, with the ability to manage all from a single console Have a complete control and administration of the contact centers, permitting an easy control. Allowing and easy way to add new devices or replace all ones. Managing several vendors in one platform is a down.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Remote Location switching. Local Tech support read only access.

Likelihood to Recommend

Better for the non-technical, but poor at more advanced concerns.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

In our organization, we use Cisco Meraki MS For the entire network. Cisco Meraki MS moves us to full cloud management network.

Likelihood to Recommend

Simple infrastructures

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We have several access points distributed is different contact center and customer agents, with metals we can manage all from a single console and give internet to the clients and officers. We monitoring the throughput of the lan and the wan and see what is happening in real time

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco Meraki MS is well suited if you have several access points distributed geographically and you need a single point of admiration and manage all for a single console. Also, is you need only a one brand of hardware in your company in order to don’t have more than one console to see the network

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Cisco Meraki MS are part of a suite including Meraki MX routers/firewalls along with MR wireless access points. They are primarily used in small-medium offices that are not considered large corporate offices but need a reliable easy to manage solution. Being cloud managed and easy to manage it provides a way for less technical staff to review/administer the devices but corporate security policies can be applied when necessary. A new switch can easily be deployed with no console cable. That's a big bonus.

Likelihood to Recommend

A Cisco Meraki solution should always be in the toolbox for a small-medium office. Especially for a project team that moves around a bit. It is very easy to deploy and if after 6 months the project moves to another location, re-deployment times are much faster than traditional kit.

Whilst it could do the job. It is not at the point of replacing a large corporate office of Catalyst Switches but we feel it does not need to do that necessarily.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We do wifi, we do office work at our company and we do it like wifi as a service.

Likelihood to Recommend

It's not a 10 because it's like some parts that need to get approved. It's approved, it can get better. It's suited for company, that's the branches, many small offices, scale, big, that type of thing. Yeah, if it's good,