Cisco UCS Series Pricing

“Positive: ROI: Operational Cost Reduction by cutting Rack Space, power, and cooling requirements. … One of the current issues we are facing is the VMware licensing, which makes it a more expensive solution.”

“Cost: can be expensive to implement.”

“That one failure probably cost us $60,000. … Dell poweredge and HP ProLiant are both less expensive than Cisco UCS servers.”

“It has made server management easier and you and allocate resources as needed We haven't had to invest in server hardware which makes the return on investment pay for itself.”

“I dont know the actual ROI vs running our environments in the Cloud, it really depends on each environment but we are saving at least 50% cost over moving the same environments to the cloud. … We have a lot of isolation between our products and we receive significant cost savings over moving all our development to the Cloud.”

“Cheaper cost but was very buggy.”

“HPE needed to outsource to 3rd party vendors for parts but was the most cost effective Dell didn't have small form factor processors needed but did offer more adadpter slots which was required.”

“Uptime Power Savings Cost Savings Management.”

“Software interface is confusing and has many bugs Price is high for premium name Back plane limitations. … You pay a high price but you get a great product.”

“With the cost saving on Data Center we were able to invest in failover infrastructure at a second location.”

“You have to purchase their memory which is more expensive than other memory choices. … Space savings - more hardware for less space - saves the reoccurring cost of colocation space and power.”