Cisco UCS SeriesPricing

Lenovo or HP or such, you find that there's about a 20 to 30% markup in price, but the quality of the product overall kind of makes up for that. So there's

For its economical hardware value and because our environment has mostly Cisco devices so for standizing and

Great hardware for the price and provides great usability.

it always comes down to me is ease of use, reliability, and most of all cost. If I can put a server in production and the end of life is 7 to 10 years

environment, so that's the positive. Negative, I don't really have any just cost.

Expensive compared to competition More manageable than competition Easier to support

Pricing Add AMD support to M7

works very well. Where it is less appropriate is where hosted applications charge by the CPU/core, like Oracle, or smaller applications.

worse as far as experience and reliability, however, not to the point that cost should not be the deciding factor.

More competitive pricing Better storage options Integration with public cloud

investment is heavy and need time for a return Blade and chassis add-on is cheaper than concurrency Flexibility allows to reassign resources depending of changing

individual can do the duties of three. Once upon a time, we had one person in charge of server upgrades, another of network fabric updates, and still another

We have made use of it to assist in lowering total cost of ownership and increasing agility factor. Every server maintains a healthy processor, memory … to work on. This results in higher production, improved availability, and cost reduction and optimization. This is a fantastic…

More investment with UCS mini going forward Cost benefit compared to other vendors More information UCS migrations with CIMC

office where only 1 or 2 servers are required. In this case, I think the cost-benefit ratio is not adequate.

Pricing Better API integration to Clour Availability

workloads spread across multiple chassis and smaller blades. This may be expensive but is much easily maintainable.

Price. You need to pay for SMARTnet to get support. High hardware cost. … evaluating Cisco UCS Series in your company. You pay a little bit higher price but you will receive a reliable, stable and manageable infrastructure. You could

negotiated, sometimes Cisco provides additional addons for free of cost which is a cost-benefit. We have been running the production and UAT environment … [The] initial investment was very expensive unless Cisco provides a…

Cost Initial configuration … Low cost of running Uptime

products and we receive significant cost savings over moving all our development to the Cloud. There is always the cost comparison between buying individual … nodes. This hardware allows us to provide our development teams significant cost savings as compared to migrating to the Cloud. We typically host our development … expense of buying the chassis. We can update indivi…

It's quite expensive Lake of knowledge between engineers … Host multiple virtual machines inside one server. Reduce the cost needed to build many servers. … devices together. Also when it comes with bundle it comes with suitable prices.

Good priced servers suitable for many virtual workloads Pre-tested for use with Cisco

are very happy with the performance and the value. … We needed servers and we got them from Cisco and the price is best. … We are All satisfied with the value and Performance of the UCS servers

Cisco UCS when it easily outperforms the other major server providers in price per performance metrics. You get usually a faster box, and well designed