Hyper-V Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 8.2 out of 10

Score

8.2 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for Hyper-V are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

Cost-effectiveness: Users consistently praise the cost-effectiveness of Hyper-V in comparison to VMware ESXi, making it a budget-friendly virtualization option that meets their financial needs. The lower upfront costs and potential savings on licensing fees are key factors driving user satisfaction with Hyper-V's affordability.

Efficient resource utilization: Many users have highlighted Hyper-V's efficiency in terms of speed of deployment and resource utilization. The automation and PowerShell accessibility contribute to streamlined operations and optimal resource allocation, resulting in improved productivity for IT teams managing virtual environments.

Disaster recovery features: The ability of Hyper-V to create backup copies of virtual machines for disaster recovery purposes has been well-received by users. This feature provides an added layer of security and peace of mind for maintaining business continuity during unforeseen events, demonstrating the reliability and robustness of Hyper-V as a virtualization solution.

Reviews

74 Reviews

Hyper-V fulfils its role with readability and confidence.

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

January 21, 2026

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Hyper-V as a virtualization solution for our environment. As we host several Windows-based applications built with Microsoft solutions, we decided to run our virtualized environment on their technology, prioritizing reliability and compliance with MS licensing. Over the years, we have also deployed some Linux-based applications, and Hyper-V still performs this role very well, hosting dozens of virtual machines running Linux-based OSs.

Pros

Management of very large virtual machines.
High availability of virtualized environment.
Virtualization of physical network.
Very fast boot of virtual machines.
Hability of moving VMs from one host to another.
Reliable instrumentation for IaaC with PowerShell.

Cons

VHD Set support for Cluster Shared Volumes.
VM console improvements, such as more integration with hosting OS.
Native backup solution.

Likelihood to Recommend

Hyper-V makes a lot of sense in scenarios that will support several Windows Server-based OS virtual machines. The only limitation of those licensed VMs is the hardware that hosts the Hyper-V role. If you need to deploy many servers running Windows Server OS, it is worth the price. Hyper-V also does a great job of managing the server host's computational resources, including memory, CPU, network, and storage.

Luiz Eduardo Garcia

System Administrator in Information Technology at JET e-business (51-200 employees)

Vetted Review

15 years of experience

View profile

Hyper-V rocks for MSPs serving the SMB market. Virtualize EVERYTHING

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

January 20, 2026

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We are a managed service provider focusing on the SMB market. We virtualize every server we put out to bolster supportability, disaster recovery, scalability, and ease our next lifestyle migration by divorcing the production environment from the hardware all together. Hyper-V's simplicity of implmentation and inexpensive licensing (included in Windows server) allows us to do this and lower the cost to service our customers while providing superior functionality!

Pros

Allows for agilty
Runs production reliably
Enhances backup and disaster recovery abilites
Gives us a secure platform from which to admin the production environment

Cons

Limited functionality without domain joined hosts

Likelihood to Recommend

Hyper-V is well suited to virtualizing low production server count environments without WAN replication or failover on discrete host hardware. It starts to be less competitive in more enterprise environments where WAN replication or SAN / Blade architecture is preferred. Scalability via dynamic resource allocation also does not seem to be as functional as the large V competition, although I have limited experience implementing this in either product.

Verified User

Manager in Information Technology (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

Reseller

15 years of experience

Hyper-V easy start into virtualization world

Rating: 7 out of 10

Incentivized

June 9, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Our company use Hyper-V virtualization software for production servers and replication of virtual machines between multiple physical hosts. It allows to isolate our VMs from hardware level and run multiple VMs on one host. For example, production software servers plus Domain controllers plus File shares all in one host computer.

Pros

virtualization of multiple machines
Replication
vhdd management

Cons

Tracking and alerts for replication status

Likelihood to Recommend

Hyper-V does the job well but minor improvements can be made such as replication alerts and status, for example email alerts.

Verified User

Account Manager in Information Technology (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

10 years of experience

Built-in, Free Hypervisor

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

December 17, 2024

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

It helps to setup, maintain and troubleshoot virtual machines to critical services like application and data servers, phone systems, email backup appliances, etc.

Pros

Built-in, free hypervisor
Easy remote access through Remote Desktop Services
Easy management through the Hyper-V console or remote via the Windows Admin Center

Cons

Almost impossible to upgrade between version 1 and version virtual machines
Basic built-in backup and replication services offered through the native Hyper-V console. Only Azure backup offerings available at the Windows Admin Center
If the Hyper-V feature is disabled, it's difficult to access your VMs Configuration Files and Virtual Hard Disks

Likelihood to Recommend

- In-house deployment of VMs for critical infrastructure.

- No upfront cost of the appliances themselves. It's built-in and free for Windows 10/11 and Windows Server hosts.

- Setup is straightforward since you only need to enable the feature within Windows.

- Backup, Disaster Recovery and Replication services are almost universal compatible. In our case, we use Acronis Cyber Protect, but Veeam is suitable too.

Verified User

Engineer in Information Technology (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

5 years of experience

Hyper-V. Rock solid environment for your VM's

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

June 15, 2023

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Hyper-V is used to host on-premise servers, is hosting Windows servers and Linux servers.It provides an easy virtualization environment without having to spend money in licensing. It's rock solid, we had not experienced availability or performance problems.

Pros

Good performance
Availavility
Reliability

Cons

DR integration with third party solutions / partners
OS updates may require rebooting the server. Too many updates monthly

Likelihood to Recommend

<div>Overall it's a good product, has a good performance, reliability and it's easy to use.</div><div>We're trying to setup a DR scenario replicated on private cloud and here is where we have found problems, because Hyper-V is not supported in this scenario, but with vmware can be done. So it's a bit dissapointing. We have to wait an update of the DR management SW or move to vmware.

</div>

Verified User

Manager in Information Technology (201-500 employees)

Vetted Review

7 years of experience

Hypervisor for the Budget Conscious

Rating: 10 out of 10

Incentivized

June 13, 2023

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Hyper-V is our production hypervisor, replacing VMware's ESXi which we ran for nearly a decade. We moved from ESXi to Hyper-V after support issues during a major incident. We also wanted to have closer integration with Microsoft Azure, our chosen Cloud platform. This has opened up the door to Azure Site Recovery to address potential Disaster Recovery scenarios.

Pros

Integration with Microsoft System Center.
MS Windows administrative users have a head start with using Hyper-V as it is a familiar product.
It's very cost effective compared to VMware ESXi.

Cons

We manage Hyper-V using both System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM) and the in-build Hyper-V administration tool, the former being the main product we use as the built-in tool is very light on functionality, unlike VMware ESXi.
Management of storage is not great and quite a shift away from how VMware does it with ESXi; there is no separate panel/blade/window for LUNs/data stores, which means there is a lot of back and forth when trying to manage storage.
A dedicated client with all functionality in one place would be awesome.
Having the equivalent of ESXi's virtual console is something which is absolutely needed.

Likelihood to Recommend

If budgets are stretched, Hyper-V is a very cost effective solution. Any veteran MS Windows administrators will have little issue in getting to grips with this. If you are familiar with VMware solutions, then you may find Hyper-V a little frustrating as it does lack some of the functionality of those products, however nothing that will prevent you from managing your virtual workloads and estate. Since rolling out Hyper-V 2019 we have had no real issues with it; ESXi seemed to have more issues and was less forgiving with hardware compatibility.

Verified User

Manager in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

3 years of experience

Hyper-V ,Great Technology for Virtualization

Rating: 10 out of 10

April 4, 2022

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Hyper-V is a great technology that allows us to create virtual machines and helps us to maintain multiple operating systems on a single physical server. This technology allows us to reduce the cost and count of physical servers in the data center.

Pros

Hyper-V allows us to test the software and tools on multiple operating systems
Hyper-V allows us to create multiple virtual machines on a single physical server
Hyper-V helps to reduce the cost and count of physical servers in data center
Microsoft provides great support and maintenance

Cons

Heavy work load application and database might face some performance issues
Disk management needs to improve

Likelihood to Recommend

Hyper-V is a great virtualization technology that allows us to create virtual machines over a single physical server. Hyper-V helps us to reduce the data center infrastructure cost and physical server count. Hyper-V provides the centralization environment to maintain all the virtual machines. We can easily manage VMs resources like disk, CPU, and memory.

Debopriya Bhattacharya

AIX Administrator in Information Technology at Kyndryl Solution Pvt Ltd (10,001+ employees)

Vetted Review

4 years of experience

2nd best

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

April 4, 2022

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We used to use Hyper-V in our organization for our virtualized workloads. Hyper-Vprovides a solution for growing organizations that have way too much of a physical presence. Without Hyper-V, datacenters would be filled with single-purpose, standalone servers. Having said that, 99% of our environment currently runs on ESXi. There are things ESXi does better and that is why we chose to move off of Hyper-V.

Pros

DR and Backup - Hyper-V can make backup copies of VM's and store them elsewhere.
Supports live migrations, storage migrations, and import/export.

Cons

Does not support macOS.
Clustered shared volume is difficult to implement at first.

Likelihood to Recommend

Hyper-V is highly scalable and flexible and does most things that VMware can, but not quite as well. I feel that Hyper-V development has stagnated and is no longer a true competitor in its class, but that does not mean that it is a bad choice. Hyper-V still needs Windows installed before you setup the Hyper-V role, whereas ESXi does not require a base OS.

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology (501-1000 employees)

Vetted Review

5 years of experience

Cost effective technology and Multitasking capabilities.

Rating: 10 out of 10

Incentivized

March 31, 2022

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Excellent technology that lets us easily create virtual machines environment and helps manage multiple operating systems on a single physical server. It enables me to quickly dedicate different groups' access to different systems because of its incredible capabilities. It effectively helps test software on multiple operating systems using multiple virtual machines and is highly reliable when running software that requires an older version.

Pros

Easy to create multiple virtual machines and manage multiple OS on a single physical hardware.
Easy to run software that require an older version.
Easy to test software on multiple OS.

Cons

Applications that requires GPUs for processing, does not work well.
High-precision applications have issues running on VM.

Likelihood to Recommend

Great technology by Microsoft that enables one to easily create virtual machines and manage multiple operating systems on a single physical hardware. It is highly flexible and helps save time and money when in need of computing resources. Live migration capabilities with windows server and Hyper-V replication for efficient backups and disaster recovery possibilities.

Stacey Arjen

Technology Product Manager in Product Management at Booking.com (10,001+ employees)

Vetted Review

2 years of experience

View profile

If you use Windows servers, Hyper-V is the best affordable choice.

Rating: 10 out of 10

Incentivized

March 30, 2022

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use 5 physical servers and run over 60 virtual servers. We user the latest version of the host server OS, because of connectivity to Azure services, use Site Recovery and Azure Backup and vulnerability checks with Security Center.

Tese solutions make it easy to plan and execute BCP and recovery of the systems.

Pros

Microsoft gives us useful supports and maintenances, technical informations about Hyper-V and other related solutions.

Cons

We would like to be able to backup and restore cluster shared volumes and VM shared volumes more easily.

Likelihood to Recommend

If you are using Windows Servers, Hyper-V is the best choice for cost-effectiveness and ease of system management.If you can buy hi-peformance host servers, you should purchace Windows Server Datacenter edition lisence.

Verified User

General Manager in Information Technology (5001-10,000 employees)

Vetted Review

10 years of experience

Loading Reviews List....

Home
,
Server Virtualization
,
Hyper-V
,
Reviews and Ratings

Hypervisor for the Budget Conscious

Rating: 10 out of 10

Incentivized

June 13, 2023

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Integration with Microsoft System Center.
MS Windows administrative users have a head start with using Hyper-V as it is a familiar product.
It's very cost effective compared to VMware ESXi.

Cons

We manage Hyper-V using both System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM) and the in-build Hyper-V administration tool, the former being the main product we use as the built-in tool is very light on functionality, unlike VMware ESXi.
Management of storage is not great and quite a shift away from how VMware does it with ESXi; there is no separate panel/blade/window for LUNs/data stores, which means there is a lot of back and forth when trying to manage storage.
A dedicated client with all functionality in one place would be awesome.
Having the equivalent of ESXi's virtual console is something which is absolutely needed.

Likelihood to Recommend

Verified User

Manager in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

3 years of experience