Hyper-V fulfils its role with readability and confidence.
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use Hyper-V as a virtualization solution for our environment. As we host several Windows-based applications built with Microsoft solutions, we decided to run our virtualized environment on their technology, prioritizing reliability and compliance with MS licensing. Over the years, we have also deployed some Linux-based applications, and Hyper-V still performs this role very well, hosting dozens of virtual machines running Linux-based OSs.
Pros
- Management of very large virtual machines.
- High availability of virtualized environment.
- Virtualization of physical network.
- Very fast boot of virtual machines.
- Hability of moving VMs from one host to another.
- Reliable instrumentation for IaaC with PowerShell.
Cons
- VHD Set support for Cluster Shared Volumes.
- VM console improvements, such as more integration with hosting OS.
- Native backup solution.
Return on Investment
- Positive: every Windows Server VM is automatic licensed.
- Positive: friendly user interface for management.
- Positive: fast deploy of new VMs.
- Positive: very fast boot of Windows Server based VMs.
- Negative: missing a native backup tool.
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Oracle VirtualBox, VMware ESXi and Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
Other Software Used
Windows Server Failover Clustering, Microsoft IIS, pfSense, OpenVPN Access Server, NAKIVO Backup & Replication, SolarWinds Serv-U, Microsoft Teams


