WebStormPricing

software, and the pricing is typically affordable. They also offer a free educationally license to hobbyists. … Positive, it’s affordable Positive, getting

multiple functionalities like knowing the value of a particular variable at each debug break point, searching the value of a variable. Great code completion

Keybinding for zoom in/out is non-standard Pricing is tough for low-cost startups

IDE it might be better for all to sync on the same one. I wouldn't take the cost aspect as a consideration. A productive developer is far more important. … Work faster - great performance and load time Negative - has cost Less prone to make merging errors

It's an irreplaceable part of my toolkit and isn't that expensive per year. … Price Product Features Product Usability Product Reputation Prior Experience

merge conflicts happen. If you're a startup or a small company that can't afford a good hardware, or software license, it might be less appropriate to use

supported a variety of languages with no specific specialty. While WebStorm has a cost associated per license, it is bar none when it comes to an integrated development

development times due to better performance, and it's well worth the licence cost. Language and platform tools, tslint support, refactoring support, etc.,

new developers can start bringing in revenue sooner, paying for the license cost in no time. Using WebStorm allows our developers to spend less time hunting

supported by a robust merge tool. WebStorm being an enterprise product has a cost and it can be optimized to be a little lightweight and fast. … supported by a robust merge tool. WebStorm being an enterprise product has a cost and it can be optimized to be a little lightweight and fast. … saving in adoption time. Being a JS…

CPU Consumer. Expensive. This software is proprietary and cannot be modified.

Price Product Features Product Usability Vendor Reputation Third-party Reviews

problems It's not free. You can have the trial version for a month, but the price is little bit high.

It would be ideal if the IDE was made free of cost like Visual Studio Code from Microsoft. That would really boost its adoption

Karma tests. The IDE is not free like Visual Studio Code or Eclipse and the cost can be a bit prohibitive for young startups.

There is no "free" version of this editor. You have to pay yearly fee, but that is very cheap in my opinion. 2. Look for different editors for different languages … NodeJS and frontend stuff. 3. Small startup companies. I have heard the prices are very high per developer which small companies cannot afford. But I am &h…

problem of needing a JavaScript IDE without the overhead and significantly cheaper licensing model compared to Visual Studio. My team and I are more productive … problem of needing a JavaScript IDE without the overhead and significantly cheaper licensing model compared to…