LambdaTestPricing

fast cheap easy to use Modern … Lambda is more cheaper and simpilistic

Very cost effective product. LambdaTest gives all QA functionality in less price compare to other products.

Cost … that advanced for what I’m using it for. It didn’t seem like the monthly cost was going to be worth it at least not right now.

identify bugs early. This resulted in a huge reduction of development/QA cost and effort. Thank you LambdaTest for doing this right. … Saved the money spent on real devices Saved the effort and cost of QA engineers Improved confidence in developers

Worth Pricing of 2000 per month for All kind of Device

User Interface Integration with CI/CD tools Pricing

wide range of virtual devices, Cheaper plan

Ease of use Cost effective

Lambdatest, Integration of lambdatest is easier and lambdatest is less expensive compared to other products like browserstack or saucelabs … Ease of use and cost-effective

I wish it there was a cheaper tier. Some months we only use it for a few minutes. … To be honest, I chose Lambdatest over BitBar because there was a cheaper plan.

LambdaTest stands out from its competitors due to its affordable pricing model, intuitive … weaknesses, LambdaTest's robust feature set, user-friendly interface, and affordable pricing make it a popular choice among developers and testers. &…

wasy an intiative UI is good for even normal non-technical staff as well, Pricing wise LambdaTest is way good than BrowserStack. Support and technical staff

incredibly easy to use! Lambdatest is incredibly efficient, reliable and cost-effective - 10/10 Some time face difficulty to load apps in slower net speed … Pricing and User friendly

cross-browser testing platform.On other platforms i was really confused and the prices was to hight.

LambdaTest beat the competition on value, reliability, speed and customer support. It was a pleasure to work with

extensions for CI/CD technologies such as Azure pipelines. It was affordably priced and compatible with the most recent browsers. Also, the CircleCI and … with a great UI and no cost of maintaining an i…

LambdaTest is comparatively an affordable option we use to test our native apps. The support has been great as well

simulators but if something is extremely mission critical and you can not afford slightest of error you need to find other solution with real device testing

Affordable price. CircleCI orb for local testing. Underpass app to assist with local … testing lab or in house virtual machines. LT Browser came for free so saving on cost of responsive testi…

scale up with parallel testing on local environment without any maintenance cost. Integration with project management tools like JIRA, CI/CD tools like Jenkins … No Maintenance Cost Integrations with CI CD tools leads to quicker releases Faster Testing &

Offers 2000+ browsers, and a myriad of devices to test on at a decent pricing plan. You also get complimentary access to the LT browser, a responsive

Obviously, a positive impact because it is faster and cheaper. … more browsers to run the tests.It is faster than other tools.It is less expensive than others.It has larger number of integration that makes developers'

Most of the time BrowserStack worked at a slower speed and it was more expensive for me. That's why I switched to LambdaTest and I have been using it for

Neat and Clean UI. Availability of browsers and integrations. Cheap pricing and features. If there's something that adds 5 stars to LambdaTest, it … decision to stick with LambdaTest. They have the neat and clean UI, their pricing is really the cheapest in the market, and…

customer support. Can easily log bugs in Jira and assign to our team member. Low cost