TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

TestMu AI

Score8.8 out of 10

228 Reviews and Ratings

Sign Up For Free!

What is TestMu AI?

TestMu AI is a cloud-based Automated Testing, Software Testing, and Performance Testing platform engineered to plan, author, execute, and analyze software quality across web, mobile, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications. Positioned as an enterprise quality engineering alternative to platforms such as BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, and Katalon, the system combines multi-framework test execution with autonomous AI testing agents. TestMu AI executes Selenium, Cypress, Playwright, and Appium test suites across cloud-hosted browser grids and real Android and iOS device clouds, while running JMeter and Gatling protocol-level load tests against Representational State Transfer (REST) and GraphQL endpoints. The platform incorporates KaneAI, an autonomous agent that generates, executes, and self-heals test scripts from natural-language prompts, alongside SmartUI visual regression testing, accessibility evaluation against Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) standards, and a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for direct Integrated Development Environment (IDE) integration.

Read more details.

Categories & Use Cases

Media

Screenshot of An automated screenshot.
Screenshot of Mobile-browser-testing
Screenshot of Automation testing on Lambdatest
Screenshot of Some of the available integrations.
Screenshot of Real-time testing
Screenshot of Responsive testing
Screenshot of Screenshot testing
Screenshot of Smart testing
Screenshot of Local host testing
Screenshot of LT Browser

1 / 10

Screenshot of An automated screenshot.

Who Buys & Uses TestMu AI

TestMu AI Reviews

What users are saying about TestMu AI.
View all TestMu AI reviews

Pros

  • Comprehensive cross-browser and cross-device testing capabilities
  • Extensive availability of real and virtual devices for testing
  • Integrated automation features for running test scripts (Selenium, Appium)

Cons

  • Performance and speed issues, including lag and slow boot times
  • Inconsistent performance, particularly on iOS devices or with lower bandwidth
  • Outdated or insufficiently detailed documentation for automation features

Better pricing and it would be the best out there

Incentivized
Felipe LisboaView profile
QA in Quality Assurance at Metha Energia (11-50 employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) to run our front end end to end test with automation and help with AI, optimizing our pipeline, and make regression tests faster, but we have to make adjustments when AI give us prompts that are not exactly what we want to test, but anyway it does give us a broader look into what we we're lacking on tests

Pros

  • AI test prompts
  • Pipeline care
  • Front end test automation

Cons

  • pricing

Return on Investment

  • made our development workflow faster
  • made our quality assurance perception better

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

Other Software Used

BrowserStack

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) is a great tool for test management

Incentivized
Verified User
Professional in Quality Assurance (501-1000 employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We are currently using TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) for creating test cases and automated tests. The business problems that TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) is solving is the agility of the workflow. We are able to work on multiple tasks and be as advanced as our competitors in the market. It helped improve our delivery in at least 40%, which helped advance the tasks of the roadmap.

Pros

  • Availability of multiple devices
  • Great generative AI for creating test cases
  • Intuitive automation tools

Cons

  • It's hard to import CSV files of test cases in Brazilian Portuguese language, most of the times it does not import
  • API automation not available
  • Lack of Brazilian Portuguese speakers when it comes to support

Return on Investment

  • Enhanced our productivity in at least 40%

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

Other Software Used

BrowserStack

Great cost-effective alternative to BrowserStack

Incentivized
Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology (201-500 employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use TestMu AI's real device testing capability to ensure the quality of our app is high across a wide range of device manufacturers and operating systems. We also use the web testing functionality to ensure that our web applications retain strong cross-browser compatibility and don't experience issues on lesser known browsers

Pros

  • Wide range of devices
  • Multiple datacenters
  • Organisational Settings

Cons

  • Kane AI reliability
  • Synced tests across multiple devices
  • Keyboard navigation improvements

Return on Investment

  • Improved Productivity
  • Higher quality applications
  • Issues caught earlier

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

LambdaTest Review

Incentivized
Verified User
Employee in Engineering (501-1000 employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Me and my team has been using LambdaTest actively for testing purposes on different mobile emulators and simulators and we really like the services offered by the LambdaTest team

Pros

  • Unit test cases were easy to handle
  • Workflow was easy to maintain and overlook
  • Very helpful in regression testing

Cons

  • Sessions could be run faster
  • Make CI/CD little more faster

Return on Investment

  • I was able to automate the tests
  • I was able to get so many devices to test and run

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

TestMu AI A powerful platform for modern Software Testing

Incentivized
Verified User
Project Manager in Information Technology (1-10 employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I needed to test my site if its seamless on all devices. I tested it on multiple devices such as mobile, tablets, iphones, browsers to check the sites responsiveness and if its breaking or not on any device. it was very easy to test and select devices. the business needed to have a seamless and responsive website so that it would not create any problem for the users, so testing it on multiple devices was a must.

Pros

  • Testing of website on multiple devices, so multiple devices support is there
  • Ease of support for selecting devices and even iphones are supported
  • was able to inspect the failures that i got
  • able to record and screenshot the pages and errors

Cons

  • well i didnt find anything or any features which were hard to use cause it is easy to use and understand even for a new comer

Return on Investment

  • Helped me make responsive site, mostly all the impacts i had are positive
  • testing on multiple devices got a lot easier

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

Other Software Used

BrowserStack

TestMu AI Alternatives

Products similar to TestMu AI that may also meet your needs.
View all TestMu AI alternatives
BrowserStack
CompareLearn more
Sauce Labs
CompareLearn more
Katalon
CompareLearn more
Testsigma
CompareLearn more