MagnoliaPricing

traditional overhead of running in-house technologies, meaning we could focus on value add, with less time spent keeping the lights on. … reach of smaller organisations but Magnolia proved proportionate in their pricing model, recognising who we were, which definitely helped.…

Cost was prohibitive for SiteCore. We liked the support that Magnolia gives us

ones we looked at that met our requirements Magnolia was clearly the best value for money and had a solid background that you could trust and that could

Price Product Features Product Usability Product Reputation Prior Experience with

Putting all together: capabilities, support, community and price... Magnolia is the best combination, maybe not the best on each aspect, but

market. But having a huge content makes us experiment a very slow time of charge that makes unhappy our clients. That's because we use over 500k nodes in

for something cheap and trendy, Magnolia might not be an option for you. This is the next level of efficiency, but it comes with a price. … migration Admin authority and level of clearance Pricing 8 … Magnolia best fits with bigger companies who can afford it and also…

releases. This made updating website code mandatory and hence increasing the cost. Difficult for beginners. Especially not from technical background.

options for creating product catalogs and other advanced tools, such as pricing and discounts. It also offers us the possibility to choose default templates

Magnolia well placed ahead of the competition thanks to its price points, features and usability ratings.

Magnolia is affordable and better for small scale projects. Also, the features are easy to understand

Magnolia is competitively priced while offering better features and a great UI.

to desire about Magnolia over the alternatives. First I would say is the cost which is relatively lower. In addition, no one can despite the capabilities

We were looking at contentful and Magnolia. But Magnolia price-wise as well and implementation wise was easier when we migrated to AWS.

implement Magnolia, it is usually because the overall project gets done faster, cheaper, and at a higher level of quality than what has been experienced in the … Fast Flexible Good for integrations Cost effective … advantages agai…

using any other software, it copies different values and updates it rather than updating the actual value. Documentation needs a lot of improvements as

most work inhouse The software is affordable with no compromises on capabilities and therefore it is gives us value for money. The templates makes the … designing pages thanks to the templates and the editor The software is affordable with no compromises on capabilities. My … Magnolia is amazing and compared to the a…

multipurpose Understanding and using Magnolia is easy It is relatively affordable

content pages. Integration into other systems we have in place, such as our pricing engine and payment gateway, are all fairly simple and seamless.

know Vaadin. Migrating from the previous major release is complicated and expensive, since Magnolia 5 isn’t compatible with the old major versions (Magnolia

but I only had a limited experience of using it. I think it is probably costed effectively, but I prefer Adobe CQ5 CMS and find it easier to use and easier … it would have a positive effect as it is a powerful tool and is not as expensive as Adobe CQ5. It may be well-suited…