Microsoft Defender for Endpoint PricingFormerly Microsoft Defender ATP

antivirus protections to free up system resources on all of our endpoints. The cost benefit of having a robust AV solution that works great with our systems

Helps to save cost through threat detection and response automation. Enhances security posture

multiple security tools. Threat detections and remediations. Licensing is expensive.

Our primary driving factor is always cost, and Defender is very cost-effective with its integration into Microsoft 365. The software … included as part of the Microsoft 365 package saved us the entirety of the cost of the previous provider. It also provides significantly more detailed security … to deliver the same resu…

Cost is very low compared to other products … cost is an important factor

is a very capable solution to solve endpoint security needs and is cost effective. … Cost Effective Good Protection Non-instrusive … organization are using Microsoft 365 E3 licensing or higher, it's a very cost effective and smart solution to take advantage of Microsoft…

no additional cost making it a strong choice based on features and cost effectiveness. … Included as part of the E5 license making it cost effective. Integrates … is an excellent choice for customers looking for strong security for good value.

Security community, so adding that to the cost comparison with other vendors made it a no-brainer. The cost of a security breach can be staggering but … full time staff or an MSSP to parse and generate alerts, which adds to the cost. Scalability

Is less expensive than other comparable products while keeping most of the functionality … Crowdstrike is the more feature complete product but licensing model and cost does not work well with the small business model. ESET Protect is considerably

having a product that's included in our Microsoft licensing at little cost is a great value-add for our company. … Freeing up the cost of a subscription for basic antivirus protection.

Included by default Price Build in in windows

challenge here is that other EDRs are sold as a lower price and not every customer understands the value of having this type of application and this type of

difficult to integrate in old systems. Sometimes face latency. Licensing and cost needs to be reduced. … Reduce infrastructure maintenance and cost. Gives good ROI. Ensure high grade security in all applications.

I think it's because they see the value in the product and also they see how much they can save in terms of the cost for companies because they already

We use this product as a modern EDR in charge of protecting our endpoints against malware, absolutely. And against all the threats that are addressed to … Price could be a good element differentiator, but most importantly the fact that

Implementation and configuration is easy. No extra subscription charge with valid windows license. Automatically isolates and resolves issues,

price

Easy, centralized managed platform for threat detection and recovery. Saves cost of additional buying any other EDR product. User interface is well established

Cost and licensing is high for small businesses. Slow the network performance

Norton is much much more expensive and difficult to use. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easy to use and

it protects and secure from cyber-attacks. From business perspective it is cost-effective and easy to use solution that offers comprehensive device and server … small scale organization Microsoft Defender for Endpoint will not fit as the cost will not affordable. Older hardware may cause performance issue and might … learning curve can impact productivity smaller organizati…

Pricing for using some of the services Complications on some of the GUI features … Cost saving one solution for threat detection and remediation Flexibility and … platform more efficient for security. The features, plus its high ROI and cost-effectiveness, recommend…

Because Defender for Endpoint is not working as expected for and compared to price and functionality we are switching from it.

Easier to integrate, less hidden fees, easier to maintain, and easier to update. Support is much better on the Microsoft

bill. I would imagine that that would end up probably being a pretty good value.