PostgreSQL (alternately Postgres) is a free and open source object-relational database system boasting over 30 years of active development, reliability, feature robustness, and performance. It supports SQL and is designed to support various workloads flexibly.
for a relational database management system PostgreSQL is great because the cost is very low compared to other databases. And the large queries speedily run … Cost Effective Easy To Use Improved the Productivity of devlopment … First It's open source and it's cost-effective…
configuration Quick setup time cost … it has allows us to quickly deploy database dependent systems with an isolated data layer The cost has saved us a large sum
confusion. Using an almost free product is economical. No license fees = minimal ownership cost. Efficiency is high due to quickness and excellent resource management
free, we could use as many database instances as we need without massive cost increase. The main thing that we like is PostgreSQL supports the JSON column … Support the JSON column and able to query by the JSON value. Free to use. Has fairly high performance. … wide feature set will be re…
It definitely helped us to save licensing cost. Cheaper support cost. Cheaper maintenance cost as it's not resource intensive. … problem that is cost. We migrated from Oracle to PostgreSQL to save license cost without compromising on RDBMS requirements. Easy ……
community that can help you with any questions and challenges. Open source, so cost of initial ownership is much lower than Oracle, MS SQL Server. … can satisfy most relational data needs. If you are in an environment where cost is a factor, or you are just starting with a project and needs to get up … Open so…
to mySQL in terms of cost and features - I'd pick either solution and be just as happy. Compared to Oracle it is a MUCH cheaper solution that is just … simpler CRUD style single-page applications. It fulfills a need for a low-cost relational data store that has been tested and proven to work. Its use of … variety of applications, especially where relati…
Cost of running and maintenance is very low License free of cost Sufficient resources available to implement … support for replication also relieves us from [the] data lost burden. Its cost for owning and maintaining [in] comparison to SQL server is low so it [suits
Since it did not create a cost step before the project, it enabled us to act more flexibly on the upper … licenses after project completion Instance number or core count is not the cost on the postgresql side, but the units of performance do not need to learn
Very low cost of ownership with zero license fees Cost of running PostgreSQL using RDS can be high but has lots of value
Open Source solution that does not cost more money to our customers help us keep our solution cost affordable. Excellent database that is well supported … we evaluated the effect on our overall solution cost to our customers. customer examine the overall cost of the solution they buy, selecting Oracle or MS-SQL … preferred Open Source solutions as we did not want to increase our solut…
requires MS Server software, and client licensing to connect for. This is an expensive way, probably more stable and reliable than open-source but after risk
key-value store solutions … Great solution for a relational database. It also continues to support and add functionality for json/hash/key-value storage
Server is its pricing scheme. Before 2012 it was sold by CPU, but after that, it was priced with licenses for 2 cores each, and its cost is in around USD … system which uses an underlying database. Then you purchase 3 servers, which cost USD 50K for the Production server, USD 25K for the Contingency Server and … Development Server.If you use a proprietary database, we…
finance department who want to know how much the users are using the app to charge them accurately, and also to customer support who wants to see user data … is not only used by engineering but also finance to measure how much to charge customers and customer support to debug customer issues. Sure, it's not … for you. The Postgres community also has develo…
one of the most successfull DBs. Knowing how to use it has extended our value on the market.
storage, and processing of all company data. We were facing massive licensing fees and large deployment times in order to deploy Microsoft SQL Server at scale … Faster than MySQL/MariaDB and obviously cheaper than Microsoft. Performance is amazing.
No licensing costs mean cheaper development costs as well as cheaper production environments. Lots of resources on best practices … Server were starting to get prohibitive. PostgreSQL gives us a stable and more cost-effective solution for data storage. Redundancy
A lot of "bang for your buck" - a lot of power at a low cost Flexibility of data types and storage means this product can handle just
No license cost Full integration with all development languages (C#, Java, Node.js, etc.) … Higher performance, developer tools, documentation, lower cost
the cost. There is none. It is a great feature rich database which doesn't cost you anything. When using properly design database, tables, and relationships … well when compared with them. Again, the feature set being similar and the cost $0 does give PostgreSQL an advantage.…
Self-hosted without licensing fees means we are able to save thousands per year on licensing fees Ability to grow into a hosted environment
Amazon RDS, you can deploy scalable PostgreSQL deployments in minutes with cost-efficient and resizable hardware capacity. Amazon RDS manages complex and
JSON/JSONB (including the ability to query and create indexes on deeply nested values).
MySQL are open source which is important for small start ups. Oracle is EXPENSIVE :) … MySQL are open source which is important for small start ups. Oracle is EXPENSIVE :) Postgres is faster than MySQL (Big factor) MySQL supports replication
