Not for larger practices
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use it as our EHR in a nutrition practice.
Pros
- Easy client interface
- Telehealth
Cons
- invoicing is terrible, in my opinion.
- setting practice defaults
- customized team access permissions
- inability to have more than one service with the same CPT code, I've found.
- inability to show clients just a list of insurances we accept, I've found.
- only 1 telehealth location despite there now being 2 telehealth place of service codes, I've found.
- inability to create default telehealth place of service codes and modifiers specific to each insurance, I've found.
- reports are lacking. I cannot pull a report to see what clients we have with a certain insurance, what percent of claims are from various insurance companies, how many sessions on average my clinicians are having with their clients, and so many more, I've found.
- scheduler and biller permissions are inadequate to do those jobs, I believe.
- Pricing is too high, I believe.
- insurance eligibility checks are a joke and why in the world are they 5 cents each? Talk about nickel and dimming in my opinion.
- Too many workarounds, in my opinion.
- widget scheduling cannot be customized, like cannot have people choose service first, then clinician. Must first choose clinician. Also cannot re-order list of providers in it, I've found.
- No cancellation emails were sent to clients, I found. Why?
Likelihood to Recommend
I think it's a good choice for solo providers who bill insurance. If you have employees or are self-pay, go elsewhere, in my opinion.
