SSIS Pricing

application. The SQL Server Integration Services is cost effective. Azure was more on the expensive side for our organization. Azure was a little complex

platform. Since we have an Enterprise Agreement with Microsoft, it does not cost any extra to use SQL Server Integration Services unlike Azure Data Factory

SSIS provided good value when there were few competitors, for somebody already using SQL Server Enterprise

Low-cost relative to other products - in fact, zero cost if one is considering the license cost as being for the database engine

additional tools. SQL Server is expensive, so running very complex processes using SSIS will become quickly very expensive.

connecting to several data sources and loading the resulting data. Less expensive than other ETL tools of same stature. Does away with the requirement for … It is more user-friendly and cost efficient.

the combined data. More cost-efficient than other ETL tools of the same stature. Reduces the need for coding scripts. … More cost-efficient than other ETL

While integrating Google Ads FB ads and maintaining the cost analysis. it was quite easy and very smooth with PowerBI. I always use powerBI

Faster loads. Cheaper alternative but more development & compromise on performance. Support with

integrated meta-data source for future processing. Less appropriate: big key-value data storages processed slowly, and hard to make data mining through uniting … installation/administration processes are easy and well-documented counter to expensive SAP requirements. One can start with totally free solutions and scale them … future. As an example - you can use a free Hyper-V core ser…

Having to do this manually is time consuming and error prone. Propagation of values from within a package to a parent package is lacking. This is helpful when

ETL tool. The PDI ETL tool is open source software and does not charge a license fee. … Paying a license fee to the SSIS ETL vehicle for our enterprise projects increases our costs. Because

However, they all cost a lot depending on the implementation you need. With SQL Server Integration Services, you do not have any added cost and, for most … enough for our needs and since it is bundled with SQL Server you get great value. Funny … We partner with other c…

the smallest learning curve out of its major competitors and was the lowest cost to implement.

there are only a small number of vendors actively supporting SSIS and license fees for production server use can be significant especially in highly-scaled … SQL Server, there is no additional one-time or recurring software license fee to pay. SSIS has a fairly shallow learning…

management systems, and we can justify the tool selection since the technology cost-effective under MS licensing. … in their approaches to ETL and Data integrations. SSIS is more affordable from a cost and licensing perspective (if you have Microsoft licensing), but … management systems…

Selection was done because of: 1. Lower Cost, 2. RDBMS was SQL Server and SSIS is tightly coupled for optimal performance … Price Product Features Product Usability Existing Relationship with the Vendor … Cost, back end RDBMS being SQL Server

things. If you just need to run a piece of SQL every hour to update some values, just use the Agent Scheduler, it's easier. But if you need to automate things … needs. The fact that we already have access to this tool at no additional cost to the business is a bonus. The fact that it is powerful, even better. Value … things. If you just need to run a piece of SQL ev…

with SQL server, so if you are already using that for the DB, we had no charge for using SSIS for the same solution. That is one big advantage of Microsoft

the sophistication and full feature set of Informatica. But significantly cheaper than Informatica. Plus since it's bundled with SS all SS shops already have … sophistication and full feature set of Informatica. But significantly cheaper than Informatica. Plus since it's…

Faster implementations Integrated reporting environments Cost savings via automation … more expert level staff for maintaining and troubleshooting thus driving the cost up for the organization

SSIS comes with standard SQL Server implementations, so it does not cost extra to utilize. On the other hand, its inflexibility makes it inferior … tools. Investments into tools other than SSIS must be weighed against the pricing model for shops already using SQL Server.

license Easy to learn and material is available for free, no need for expensive training

tool and overall its easier to use than SSIS, but SAP is at a much higher price point than Microsoft. Microsoft can be a good fit for businesses of any size

migrate into the new system, we found out quickly it wasn't going to be cheap (because those companies could not sell the adapters they would build to