WRITER Review
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We use it to automate end to end training curation. WRITER's agents allow us to use our bespoke and proprietary context document backed by learning science to output a skills taxonomy, needs analysis, full granular curriculum, and actual learning assets. All of this is backed, contextualized, and synthesized by prompts, information, and resources that we curated in house.
Pros
- Referencing specific context documents
- Writing bespoke text-based content
- Clear and precise outputs based on specific prompts
- Quick outputs for small and medium prompts
- Very user-friendly client-facing interface
- A lot of QoL in terms of foldering and prompting are done in the client-facing interface
Cons
- The current agents have weird responses sometimes
- QOL Features for the admin-facing AI Studio part, specifically folder organization, labeling, etc.
- Can do a little more speed when referencing big documents, knowledge graphs, and complex prompts. It takes a couple of minutes sometimes, to answer.
Likelihood to Recommend
It is very easy to navigate, build, and contextually meld your agent into whatever you like. As long as you know how their back-end no-coding platform works, it becomes a breeze to create bespoke content that actually matters, and makes sense. We've done this with multiple agents and as I call it, "sub-functions". There's a lot more potential the agents can do, all you need to know is to just learn the process.