Financial Institution using DNAC
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco DNA Center
The goal is to use DNAC for software upgrade automation and wireless assurance. We have hundreds of devices across several states, and it is not always possible to travel to each location to troubleshoot wireless in a timely manner. Any data we can receive from DNAC is a huge boon. With SWIM, we can push images quickly, and with little supervision. This frees up availability across the team.
Pros
- Image management
- Wireless assurance
- Device inventory
Cons
- Migration from Prime
- SD-WAN integration
- Automation
- Scalable image management
Today we are running Prime along with DNA Center. Thankfully, Cisco does provide automated tools to migrate. however, it does not feel as if the two products have parity at this moment. I've noticed I juggle between the two to troubleshoot wireless issues and configure individual settings on our access points
Do you think Cisco Catalyst Center delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Catalyst Center's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Catalyst Center live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Catalyst Center go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Catalyst Center again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation