Cisco Intersight review
Updated March 13, 2025
Cisco Intersight review

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Modules Used
- Cisco Intersight Infrastructure Service
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Intersight
Managing the UCS chassis and the fabric interconnect switches
Pros
- Firmware updates
- Config management
Cons
- Integration with nexus switches
- Central management
Easier interface
Central management
Mobile app
Do you think Cisco Intersight delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Intersight's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Intersight live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Intersight go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Intersight again?
Yes
Using Cisco Intersight
9 - IT Operations admins with a mix of Linux and Windows admins.
2800 - We have 3 call centres spread across 2 countries.
- Ease of managing the server infrastructure
- Ensuring standardisation of deployments
- Managing the firmware
- Remote management
- Review confirg before a chage
- Pre planning a change
- Access for external support
- Managing hardware in other countries
- Capacity planning
Evaluating Cisco Intersight and Competitors
Yes - Hitachi Hitrack and all the server.
- Cloud Solutions
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
Main piece was that it did fit with our Cloud roadmap.
Cisco Intersight Implementation
- Implemented in-house
- Third-party professional services
Truis
Change management was a big part of the implementation and was well-handled - No major lessons
Cisco Intersight Training
Configuring Cisco Intersight
Would be great to have system template, Vmware or hyper-v ect.
Some - we have done small customizations to the interface - fairly but we did rely on professional services from another company.
No - we have not done any custom code
Cisco Intersight Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed No escalation required Immediate help available Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | None |
24/7 support and 4 hour turn around.
So far have not needed exceptional support as the product is just working.
Using Cisco Intersight
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Technical support not required Well integrated Quick to learn Feel confident using | None |
- Adding new hardware
- Fabric interconnect switch view and management
- VKVM
- Profiles and policies can get a bit confusing.
Yes, but I don't use it
Integrating Cisco Intersight
- Pure Storage
- Nexus switches
Just providing system visability. Not too difficult but it should be easier.
None currently as we have designed around the USC and Intersight platform.
- Single Signon
The biggest issue that I have had is that there should be more integration with other Cisco hardware and platforms. Nexus switches is one. Whilst it can be done by deploying a Nexus dashboard server and then adding it in, it needs to be like adding servers and other components.
Relationship with Cisco
Cost and support we the 2 top for me. But they also helped to ensure that we reviewed our options carefully, presented options that we did not initially identify and did provide value.
I think the part I would like to see is the ongoing interactions and support. Not saying that we do not receive this but would be great if it was not always sales driven. What is often missed is the value-added service often brings its own sales.

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation