Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers review
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers
We are using C9800-L-F-K9 and C9800-40, which is implemented over 1200 sites in our environment where wireless is heavily used, it gives us flexibility to make use of wireless media with advance features with IOS-XE based Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers.
It helps us overcomes problems related to Infra and mainly in plant area. Where network drops on forks lifts and scan guns and other type of critical issues. With radio active tracec we can analyse what is happening and how to isolate it.
It helps us overcomes problems related to Infra and mainly in plant area. Where network drops on forks lifts and scan guns and other type of critical issues. With radio active tracec we can analyse what is happening and how to isolate it.
Pros
- Documentation
- Stability
- Easy to use and navigate
Cons
- More visibility during IOS upgrade
- RMI + RP Config data
- More GUI friendly commands
- Easy traffic handling
- Better performance than AIROS
- Minimal downtime to business
- Better management
- WiFi Attendance and NEXUS
Because of the features and flexibility it brings with it.
Business has less downtime since we implemented it.
Business has less downtime since we implemented it.
Do you think Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation