Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers Are Still the Best I've Used for Large Scale Wireless Network Environments
July 04, 2025
Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers Are Still the Best I've Used for Large Scale Wireless Network Environments

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
5520 Wireless Controller
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers
We use various Cisco Wireless Lan Controllers at several of our venues and offices. As a network engineer for a live sports and music entertainment company, we use Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers to service all of our Cisco access points in both sparse and dense deployments through our various arenas, theaters, stadiums, and offices. These access points provide wireless connectivity to all of our corporate staff, partners, vendors, and customers.
Pros
- Does a fantastic job of providing detailed client data (e.g. how long the client has been associated, what band the client is connected to, what AP, IP/MAC info)
- Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers provide an incredibly flexible way to engineer different wireless network solutions for different needs. For example, you have various ways to tweak and optimize wireless multicast based traffic, you can set different AP groups to better manage which APs should broadcast certain SSIDs, the ability to increase or decrease transmit power levels on an AP, and so much more!
- Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers have a reliable and relatively easy image upgrade process that allows you stagger the AP image upgrade process to minimize downtime
Cons
- I would love to see the ability to have a tool like Cisco Prime natively built into the Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers. While the WLC does provide detailed client data, you need to rely on tools like Cisco Prime to provide you with more comprehensive data about the client such as their roaming history, how many times have they associated/de-associated to a certain AP, how many auth errors has the customer experienced, what type of traffic is the client consuming, etc.
- High wireless access availability, various options to perform wireless network tuning, a diverse feature set to segment certain parts of wireless traffic based on things like SGTs, AP groups, etc., and the ability to provide various authentication options
Not sure why "Ruckus WLAN controllers" is not listed above but that is another major WLAN controller solution I've used in the past. Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers provide the most flexibility when it comes to designing a large WLAN deployment. They also have some of the best reliability and TAC support out of all of the other vendors.
Do you think Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Wireless LAN Controllers again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation