Cutting down manual time spent on generation of agreements by 80% | TrustRadius

Overall Satisfaction with Conga CLM

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

In our organization, We use Conga CLM for buy side agreements workflows.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Generate agreements
Store agreements in single repository
Report and provide insights to contract teams

Cons

X-Author is very tedious.

Return on Investment

Cutting down manual time spent on generation of agreements by 80%
Use the data stored in Conga CLM to drive downstream processes

Scalability

1

We dont use this Conga capability. So its actually NA

Simplification

Yes it has definitely helped cut down manual hours spent in generating documents and obtaining approvals on agreements.

Alternatives Considered

DocuSign CLM

DocuSign is higher up on the Gartner Quadrant.

Key Insights

Do you think Conga CLM delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Conga CLM's feature set?

Yes

Did Conga CLM live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Conga CLM go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Conga CLM again?

Yes

Likelihood to Recommend

If asked, I think I am likely to tell a colleague that, in my opinion, Conga CLM Need faster and better capabilities using AI (artificial intelligence)

Conga CLM Feature Ratings

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation