Control-M user for 4 years
February 02, 2026

Control-M user for 4 years

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Modules Used

  • Application Integrator
  • Managed File Transfer
  • SLA Management

Overall Satisfaction with Control-M

We use our Control-M thru our batch processing and like task scheduler job.

When migrating a batch process, we usually used the Knowledge article to resolve issues, if not we open a BMC ticket to resolve it.

Pros

  • Manage File Transfer
  • OS type job
  • Cyclic jobs

Cons

  • When upgrading Control-M EM (enterprise manager)/Server and other components
  • Batch processing was improve from manual to automated
  • Notification for errors encountered
  • We can easily get the estimated time of completion of all jobs
12 - Control-M Admin, Control-M Operator, Control-M scheduler
Although we haven't utilize all the applications yet, currently using OS (operating system) type job, MFT (managed file transfer), File watcher and SLA (service level agreement), we planned to utilize all functions for the next succeeding quarter.
Control-M is more flexible and reliable.

Do you think Control-M delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Control-M's feature set?

Yes

Did Control-M live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Control-M go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Control-M again?

Yes

Using the managed file transfer is a good tool and using applications integrator works well

Control-M Feature Ratings

Multi-platform scheduling
9
Central monitoring
9
Logging
9
Alerts and notifications
9
Analysis and visualization
9
Application integration
9

Comments

More Reviews of Control-M