Item: Lumar
Rating: 6
Author: Katie Goh

Overall Satisfaction with DeepCrawl

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I used DeepCrawl as a part of the Conductor integration. I used it to crawl areas of our site to search for SEO issues.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Categorizing issues found
Crawling Javascript

Cons

Difficult to drill down to site sections
Too much data - Filtering could be improved

Return on Investment

Helped us find meta title and description issues sitewide

Alternatives Considered

seoClarity and Screaming Frog SEO Spider

Personally I prefer seoClarity's crawler and it's built into their all in one platform.

Deepcrawl has a nice interface though

I liked the platform overall. It is a good crawler. I no longer use because it's duplicate of what I get with seoClarity. I did not give it 10/10 because sometimes I had a hard time isolating site areas that I wanted and didn't get much technical support from Conductor on how to use the tool

Key Insights

Do you think Lumar delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Lumar's feature set?

Did Lumar live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Lumar go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Lumar again?

Yes

Other Software Used

seoClarity

Likelihood to Recommend

DeepCrawl is great for agencies looking to crawl sites. Likely not a great fit for beginner SEOs as there are a lot of data points given without clear priority.

Deepcrawl is not to be used for scanning new opportunities, keyword positions, site wide metrics for large sites. No SERP data shown.

Lumar Feature Ratings

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Conductor + DeepCrawl integration