HP ALM
November 30, 2017

HP ALM

Midhun Prabha | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with HP Application Lifecycle Management

HP ALM is being used by the various teams in IT department. It's mainly used for Test Management and Defect Management.

Pros

  • Defect Management and Reporting
  • Test Management and Reporting
  • Traceability with requirements, test cases and defects
  • Custom reports

Cons

  • Excel report are not easier to create. Earlier versions were better at this.
  • Cloning a defect and editing will not save the data if we move to another defect in between editing.
  • Sprinter integration can be improved.
  • Positives are the ability to manage the test cases and defects and pulling custom reports for both.
  • Negatives are having to take a considerable amount of time coming up with custom reports.
JIRA, Rally. We had other HP tools for automation and because of that we decided to go with ALM QC
HP ALM works well if all of the test management including requirements, test cases, and defects are handled in QC. It doesn't work well when there are multiple tools involved in requirements, test cases and defects. Integrating all can be a pain sometimes.

Comments

More Reviews of OpenText ALM/Quality Center

  1. Home
  2. Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Tools
  3. OpenText ALM/Quality Center Reviews
  4. User Review of OpenText ALM/Quality Center