Overall Satisfaction with Huntress
At my company we use Huntress for an external layer of protection for the network. We rely on Huntress to inform of us external threats or attempts to penetrate the network.
The main business problem that Huntress solves is protection and awareness of the unknown actors and processes trying to brute force into the network. Short of hiring a SOC service, which can be quite expensive, Huntress is the best value for peace of mind from external threats.
The main business problem that Huntress solves is protection and awareness of the unknown actors and processes trying to brute force into the network. Short of hiring a SOC service, which can be quite expensive, Huntress is the best value for peace of mind from external threats.
- External threat reporting
- External threat protection
- External threat remediation
- The portal has not really been updated
- UI can be an adjustment to get used to
- There are sometimes false positives
- Incredible value for the service
- Business-saving information of exploit attempts
- Extremely easy deployment to the network resources
Carbon Black was much more expensive and had a bit more buy-in than we were able to sell companies on. The portal was not as simplified. The services are similar in execution, and we did not find Carbon Black lacking, but Huntress is easy to use, easy to deploy, and a better value.
Do you think Huntress delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Huntress's feature set?
Yes
Did Huntress live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Huntress go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Huntress again?
Yes