IBM BPM - the best commercial BPM software package
Overall Satisfaction with IBM Business Process Manager
Pros
- Coordinates work across departments.
- Organizes processes around customer inputs and outcomes rather than around silos and divisions.
- Integrates with other software systems in a straightforward way.
- Provides efficient UI building functionality - for UIs on mobile, tablet, and desktop browsers.
- Measures efficiency, process outcomes, SLAs.
- Particularly strong in Financial processes (loan origination, insurance underwriting, asset management, bond processing), but also works well for logistics processes and customer services processes.
Cons
- Installation is (typically) a bit painful out of the box and requires expert help.
- Following installation, initial projects require outside consulting expertise to be successful. Projects without importing BPM expertise tend to have much higher failure rates. Though individually the technologies involved are widely available and not complicated, combined and collectively BPM solutions require a flexible, creative, technical talent to help deliver. It takes time to learn the judgment and craft required.
- The out-of-the-box UI controls (widgets) are not terribly inspiring- on desktop or mobile. Use of third party toolkits (e.g. Brazos) is recommended. Silver lining: those third party toolkits are quite good.
- We use IBM BPM more to help our customers than to help ourselves. For our customers, IBM BPM has helped us dramatically reduce cycle time of previously manual processes, while increasing accuracy and customer satisfaction. However, it is difficult to get customers to go on record with ROI as they treat this as confidential/private information.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation