IBM Security QRadar SOAR Review | TrustRadius

Overall Satisfaction with IBM Security QRadar SOAR

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

In our organization, we utilize IBM Security QRadar SOAR primarily for automating repetitive tasks to reduce the workload on analysts. It serves as a central hub for managing and orchestrating all security incidents. By enforcing predefined tasks and workflows, it streamlines incident response processes, ultimately enhancing our overall security posture.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Automation to Reduce Time on Analysts
Enforcing Tasks
Central Hub for All Incidents

Cons

playbook ui
adding new features constantly
customization version control

Return on Investment

reducing time = less analysts = less pay
companion ticketing systems in one place

Alternatives Considered

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR and Microsoft Sentinel

IBM QRadar SOAR is more suited for reliability and simpler integrations

Key Insights

Do you think IBM Security QRadar SOAR delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with IBM Security QRadar SOAR's feature set?

Yes

Did IBM Security QRadar SOAR live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of IBM Security QRadar SOAR go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy IBM Security QRadar SOAR again?

Yes

Other Software Used

LogRhythm NextGen SIEM Platform, Microsoft Sentinel

Likelihood to Recommend

it would suit environments where limited, reliable customization is needed, if you need insanely advanced customization you shouldn't go with it

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation