InterMapper, the best network map around?
April 11, 2017

InterMapper, the best network map around?

Nick Erwin | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with InterMapper

We currently use InterMapper to monitor Layer 2 and Layer 3 devices. We also InterMapper to grab SFlows and NetFlows to put together graphs and statistics. We are able to monitor the devices and flows in real-time. The Help desk, server team and network team use the monitoring, alerting and statistics to quickly address and resolve any issues across the WAN.
  • The maps are excellent visual representations of the network. I find the maps easier to create and manage, than in Orion Network Atlas (SolarWinds).
  • The live maps are great for managing a large WAN.
  • Great for monitoring utilization and device status.
  • I would love to see more graphs and reports comparable to SolarWinds.
  • Alerts and notification on Up/Down status for remote locations before the users at the remote location can even report it.
  • A great way to identify a possible issue at a site and improve functionality.
  • We have used the interface and condition status to identify ports in half-duplex that needed to be set to Full.
  • SolarWinds
InterMapper offers a cheaper and easier network map over SolarWinds Orion Network Atlas. It lacks SolarWinds graphs, reports and statistics. For monitoring, alerting and at a glance information, InterMapper is hard to beat for the price.
Excellent for verifying a device status at a remote location at a glance. Excellent monitoring of interface utilization. A great way to find a device in the chart that may be using up a lot of bandwidth.