Overall Satisfaction with InterMapper
We currently use InterMapper to monitor Layer 2 and Layer 3 devices. We also InterMapper to grab SFlows and NetFlows to put together graphs and statistics. We are able to monitor the devices and flows in real-time. The Help desk, server team and network team use the monitoring, alerting and statistics to quickly address and resolve any issues across the WAN.
- The maps are excellent visual representations of the network. I find the maps easier to create and manage, than in Orion Network Atlas (SolarWinds).
- The live maps are great for managing a large WAN.
- Great for monitoring utilization and device status.
- I would love to see more graphs and reports comparable to SolarWinds.
- Alerts and notification on Up/Down status for remote locations before the users at the remote location can even report it.
- A great way to identify a possible issue at a site and improve functionality.
- We have used the interface and condition status to identify ports in half-duplex that needed to be set to Full.
- SolarWinds
InterMapper offers a cheaper and easier network map over SolarWinds Orion Network Atlas. It lacks SolarWinds graphs, reports and statistics. For monitoring, alerting and at a glance information, InterMapper is hard to beat for the price.