QA Engineer
February 17, 2025
QA Engineer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with LambdaTest
We tried LambdaTest for cross-browser testing and were impressed with how easy it was to use. It saved us a lot of time running tests across different browsers. The cloud-based platform worked smoothly.
However, it didn’t fit our needs because we use microphone functionality in our application, and LambdaTest doesn't fully support that.
However, it didn’t fit our needs because we use microphone functionality in our application, and LambdaTest doesn't fully support that.
Pros
- can take screenshots or record videos of your tests. This helps in sharing issues with your team or documenting bugs.
- lets you compare how your website looks on different browsers, ensuring there are no visual problems.
Cons
- My application has voice features, LambdaTest may not be the best option for testing these aspects, which limits its use for such applications.
- LambdaTest also does not support testing desktop applications or Chrome plugin applications, which further limits its use for certain types of software. For example, if your application is a desktop-based tool or a Chrome extension, LambdaTest wouldn’t be suitable for testing those aspects of the product. This limitation means that additional tools or platforms would be required to cover those specific testing needs, impacting overall testing efficiency and increasing costs.
Do you think TestMu AI delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with TestMu AI's feature set?
Yes
Did TestMu AI live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of TestMu AI go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy TestMu AI again?
No
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation