Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance - great if you are complex but not if agile
Overall Satisfaction with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Our company uses Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance (F&O) for project management, time entry, and billing for all the consultants in our Microsoft Dynamics implementation business. Our company spans three countries, US, Canada, and Ukraine. The data entry is entirely in F&O, and there has been significant work to form a synchronization between F&O and DevOps where our development and documentation reside for projects. This process was long and arduous, with many hurdles and it took about two years to complete.
Pros
- Financial reporting
- Multi-company consolidation
- Hub and spoke setup
- Web-based access
Cons
- Flexibility in configuration
- Project management tracking
- Interoperability with external systems
- Ease of customization
- Because F&O is not very nimble, we are looking to reimplement
- The lack of interoperability has hindered our ability to use external tools to supplement shortcomings of the product
- The inflexibility has lead to great frustration from team leads
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance is more robust, and can handle larger, more complex business operations, and have better delineation between corporate management and divisions in a company, but it is not flexible, nor easy to change. It is complex, inflexible, and difficult to incorporate new workflows or business rules to accommodate changes in the business. We have changed over the past decade and while F&O is big and robust, it is not nimble.
Do you think Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance delivers good value for the price?
No
Are you happy with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance's feature set?
No
Did Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance again?
No


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation