Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud vs. OneStream
June 28, 2019
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud vs. OneStream
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Modules Used
- Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud
Overall Satisfaction with Oracle EPM Cloud
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud is being considered for several clients and I have supported implementation with one client in particular. This Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud implementation is more focused on a smaller group of financial reporting users. The main purpose is to perform consolidations and manage closing activities across entities in various countries.
Pros
- Close management and consolidation in one module.
- Strides have been made to bring Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud parity to HFM.
- Dynamic reporting capabilities.
Cons
- The fact that it is still a separate tool for planning (ePBCS) drives challenges around baseline data.
- The set-up for VIE is still arduous and often does not meet all use cases.
- The cloud pushed monthly updates are a challenge, however, it has become more transparent.
- Decreased the time to run the consolidation processes.
- Decreased the need for on-premise type IT support (now fully supported in finance).
- Increased the frequency with which management was getting results.
OneStream is a very young product and young company, however, it offers a singular platform for both budgeting and consolidation. In addition, Onestream is not built on Essbase (a product that is rather old) and therefore has more dynamic capabilities. OneStream does not, however, have many implementations to prove the efficacy of the product.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation