Good UI Components BUT bad experience with PDF generator
January 06, 2022
Good UI Components BUT bad experience with PDF generator
Score 5 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Progress Telerik UI
We have worked extensively with Telerik's React, Blazor, MVC, WebForms and PDF Document Processing controls for a variety of applications.
Pros
- Great support
- Good quality UI components
- Great UI control performance
Cons
- Poor PDF library: generated files were MASSIVE in size. We switched to Syncfusion because of this issue.
- Poor user experience with their date picker components (too many clicks to choose a year in the past)
- Documentation could be more complete
- Telerik launches iOS components and then dropped them
- Great support
- Great performance for React and Blazor components
- Diverse components with sufficient depth
- Faster to develop apps
- Better quality apps
I purchased Telerik because its components seemed great and were priced more attractively than Syncfusion. Unfortunately, after hitting major product limitations with Telerik's Document Processing for PDF I now find myself migrating from Telerik to Syncfusion. This has been an expensive lesson.
Do you think Progress Telerik delivers good value for the price?
No
Are you happy with Progress Telerik's feature set?
No
Did Progress Telerik live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of Progress Telerik go as expected?
No
Would you buy Progress Telerik again?
No
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation