Progress Telerik

We have different web applications that use grids, forms , and schedulers. Using Progress Telerik components, we simply used grids with templated, and a very good looking scheduler with many useful features. Communication of component with the backend using data source features are simple. In addition to these components we used cards and graphs as well.

• The development time went shorter
• Good looking web application that attracts users

Syncfusion® Essential Studio®

Microsoft Visual Studio, GitKraken, FileZilla

We've used Progress Telerik for several MAUI and WinUI3 apps. We've found it very helpful for controls like rich text editing and tabs that seem common but for some reason do not have great tooling built-in (or in the community toolkit). So ultimately, we used Progress Telerik to plug the gap in several different platforms where the built-in tooling was not sufficient.

• We've tried other third party controls (syncfusion, etc.) and burned significant time trying to get them to work. Progress Telerik is the only one that stuck. Developer time on this kind of thing is rather expensive, I don't have hard numbers but spending dozens of hours on a product that doesn't do what you want is not great.

Syncfusion® Essential Studio®

Microsoft Visual Studio

I've been using Progress Telerik's products in these platforms:

- ASP.Net Webforms

- ASP.Net Core

- Xamarin

- JQuery

- Angular

They help me include complex functionality into my apps very easily.

• It has cut my development time significantly
• It has allowed me to make apps that look professional
• It has allowed me to add advanced features

DevExpress Universal

JetBrains Rider, Microsoft Visual Studio, Microsoft Visual Studio Code

We use the Progress Telerik control libraries to save time and simplify development of ASP.NET MVC and Blazor applications, and we're moving into using the MAUI pieces as well. Some controls feel like overkill, since the packages include things like textboxes - which DO have some minor extra features, but not enough to switch them out in my opinion. But it also includes advanced ones such as image editors, popovers, cards, skeletons, graphs and so much more that save tons of time when we develop any kind of LOB application.

• The ROI of the Progress Telerik package took about a work week
• It's saved tons of time spent on hashing out features, Progress Telerik already does it
• Faster deliveries, more frequent deployments with higher confidence

DevExpress Universal, Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition and Blazorise

Microsoft Visual Studio, CodeRush, GitHub Copilot

We use the Telerik UI ASP.Net AJAX controls on our intranet web-application software deployed to various automotive customers. The controls helped accelerate the creation of screens and dashboards with a consistent user experience. Further, the controls added features and functions without requiring boiler-plate code to be added (such as the Grid control providing filtering, sorting, and paging right out of the box without any additional code work). Other controls (such as the Tree Drop Down), provide great user experience with little to no additional customization required to get the web control to behave / present in the fashion we need. Finally, the demos from Telerik provide excellent references for determining how to do things. The only draw back is on the documentation side, where if you step out of the demo examples, it can be difficult to find the information you need on the document site, and determine what and why you need to something special. Overall, I would emphatically recommend the use of Telerik UI controls to vastly improve the UI experience for your end-users, and accelerate the development time involved in creating the User Interface screens.

• Controls come with a lot of built in features. For example, the Grid control has built-in Filtering, Sorting and Paging for data.
• Great demos that showcase a variety of usage scenarios
• Cost-effective bundles providing a wide range of platforms to use and implement similar functionality.

• Documentation site is somewhat lacking. So if you step out of the usage scenarios of the demos, you will find the learning curve steep.

ComponentOne

ASP.NET