Item: Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Rating: 8
Author: Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use RHEL as our primary OS in the datacenter. It’s stable, secure, and reliable for running critical apps. It helps us stay compliant, automate tasks with Ansible, and maintain consistency across all environments. It’s the solid foundation we need to run smoothly and scale confidently.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Stability
Security
Consistency

Cons

Desktop environments.
Subscription and licensing process.

Return on Investment

Enhanced security and compliance.
Automation with Ansible.
Reduced downtime and improved infrastructure stability.

Usability

It’s highly stable, well-documented, and integrates seamlessly with enterprise tools.

Alternatives Considered

Debian OS and Windows Server

We chose RHEL over other Linux distributions because of its enterprise support, stability, and security features. Compared to alternatives like Ubuntu or CentOS, RHEL offers more extended lifecycle support.

Key Insights

Do you think Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)'s feature set?

Yes

Did Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) again?

Yes

Other Software Used

Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise, ChatGPT

Likelihood to Recommend

RHEL is an excellent fit for datacenter environments—it’s reliable, secure, and stable, making it ideal for running critical infrastructure and services. However, it’s less suited for end-user desktop environments, where the interface and experience can be challenging for non-technical users or those coming from Windows or macOS.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Feature Ratings

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation