Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Stability and performance are top-notch and if any issues are encountered their support is also excellent

Critical production environments are the best for RHEL case as the product ensures the security, stability and it is backed by the world class support that the most of the companies (and their shareholders) would appreciate.
It might not be too suitable for the startups or even some Dev teams within large enterprises, depending on their internal culture and practices. Though things definitely improved over the last few years and there is no strong case for the teams not to use RHEL nowadays.

Stable and support are great.

In my opinion RHEL is extremely capable for most all work done. Maybe not as easy for some office type applications but still very capable.

Stable operating system. Easy to support at scale

Unless you're tied to a specific OS for the app, there is no reason why you wouldn't want to use Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

We use it as our primary OS and replacement OS for Microsoft.

Well suited for those who are network savvy. And for those who like CLIs.

Development environment for developing microservices based solutions. The orchestration to carry new applications from development to production deployment.

Workloads on public cloud where customers require reliability and supportability for applications and targeted hardware for multiple years.

It's very useful for our Linux servers.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux works well with Oracle Database workload.

Large scalable environments. Currently working toward SAP setup. Things have been stable so far. Uptime is great, aside from normal patching reboots. The only thing I can think of where Rhel wouldn't be too great is a workstation. Works well for most things, but I've found a few tools that there isn't a Linux port for.

A strong, reliable system for web site and web application hosting.

We use RHEL because it gives us security when setting up our services. We try to standardize our DC and work as much as possible with RHEL due to its ease of use, its support and the information that is found is very useful when running into a problem. I'm happy using RHEL.

I have had a very easy time imaging RHEL machines and getting them to the state i desire. I find pam very confusing and how to make changes that are required in the classified environments. it would be nice if there were an easier way to see required dependencies to prevent me walking back and forth multiple times to complete one install.

Installing and configuring RHEL has been an ease to learn and execute. Most of the applications that I run requires linux or unix, which RHEL is my companies choice because of it reputation and the resources it provides.

RHEL is well-suited for applications where stability and security are critical, as well as where the ability to scale it and still manage efficiently is crucial.

It is less well-suited for environments where there are individual, specific requirements, where newer versions of libraries and applications are required, and particularly in migration of legacy .Net applications.

I think based on experience the stability the ease of patching and troubleshooting it is suitable for any application development. Less suitable when it involves integration with other windows servers for implementations such as SQL or other instances since the configuration seems complicated for most Windows users, command line most of the time is intimidating.

For large and small scale applications which limited CPU usages works level but Red Hat need to develop think for DB based systems to make sure they run without any performance degrade

we are using Red Hat among 8K servers and patching is very fun for us :)

Multitasking, SSH, etc

RHEL provides the tuning needed for our needs. We are able to use the repositories provided to satisfy most if not all of our customers' needs. We are able to provide solutions to our end users who didn't know they were even available.

We have a combination of Windows and Linux in our organization. The Windows systems are to provide support to the RHEL systems, such as Active Directory, File/Print servers etc. We've been replacing as many of the Windows systems with RHEL as we can due to the fact RHEL is just easier to manage, it's more stable, and it's far easier to automate. We fight with automation on Windows and configuration drift on Windows is a challenge. We don't have these issues with RHEL, and using ansible on RHEL is just inherent.

Data delivery, data capture, automation