Best open-source caching database
May 12, 2021
Best open-source caching database
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Redis
Redis is used as cache storage in our data visualization application where response time is key. We use Redis for some of the flag features in a system with more than 20,000 internal users. This in-memory database helped to solve many of the use cases we've had on our product like user based caching, realtime analytical operations on one time fetched results.
Pros
- A modern key-value store in-memory database.
- Redis [is thorough] and details user documentation.
- Data distribution on a multi-tenant cluster is easy and reliable.
Cons
- It lacks support for datatypes that are available on other products.
- Making it work with Celery is a bit hard and sometime it's not reliable.
- Lacks better UI like other systems.
- Redis is easily one of the best open source in-memory database to invest in.
- Redis is best for caching, easy to set up, and it's easy for anyone use with the help of its great documentation.
- The distributed cache makes it even faster when using multiple data-centers across continents.
UI isn't that great compared to the other competitors.
The management of our memcached cluster was becoming pretty complicated as the application grew in size. Redis is a much better option compared to memcached.
Redis is bit unreliable compared to the alternative RabbitMQ especially when it needs to be integrated with Celery.
The management of our memcached cluster was becoming pretty complicated as the application grew in size. Redis is a much better option compared to memcached.
Redis is bit unreliable compared to the alternative RabbitMQ especially when it needs to be integrated with Celery.
Do you think Redis Software delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Redis Software's feature set?
Yes
Did Redis Software live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Redis Software go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Redis Software again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation