Replication Server offers guaranteed delivery and data protection
Overall Satisfaction with SAP Replication Server
We use SAP Rep Server to create a warm standby read only copy of our data to be used for reporting and other decision support type activities. It is used within our department and is not an enterprise solution. The Enterprise solution that is recommended is Oracle's Golden Gate. We use Replication Server because it offers guaranteed delivery and transactional consistency. It also offers low latency so we can run critical jobs against the warm standby copy knowing that copy is only ever a few seconds behind the transactional copy.
Pros
- guaranteed delivery
- high availability
- scalable
- low latency
- data transformation
Cons
- make implementation easier
- make programming easier
- offer out of the box pre-defined use cases
- Positive in the fact that Rep Server has prevented corruption from being propogated
- Positive - we continue to see value every day from the product
- Positive - we replicate our audit trail to an audit server that no one can touch - has helped to prevent and detect fraud
We use SAP ASE as our main system of record and therefore it just made sense to use SAP Rep Server. We did evaluate Golden Gate, however, GG seems to be much more complex than Rep Server. We could not easily find GG talent on the street but are able to find Rep Server talent. During our evaluation of the products, both could equally accomplish the task, so it all came down to two factors: 1. we are using ASE and 2. finding talent.
Do you think SAP Replication Server delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with SAP Replication Server's feature set?
Yes
Did SAP Replication Server live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of SAP Replication Server go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy SAP Replication Server again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation